×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fire case Relief

Fire case Relief

Fire case Relief

(OP)
Hi All,

I am wondering if the relief rate form a PSV sized for fire case is dependent upon plant feed rate. Let's say we want run an existing plant at 130% capacity and do the debottleneck work.
Do we need to rerate the fire case relief also?? The equations in API 521 don't indicate the same.
Your insight/thoughts are welcome.

Thanks  

RE: Fire case Relief

Without looking at the specific system, I can only offer general advice.  There are two primary fire cases typically evaluated: vapor generation, gas expansion.

Fire - Vapor Generation
In this case you're typcially protecting vessels with a constant liquid level.  Most vessels have an upper limit of anticipated liquid (set by high level switches or controllers).  If you have a scrubber that normally sees 50 MMSCFD but is now seeing 65 MMSCFD, will the highest expected liquid level in that vessel change?   Probably not.  Perhaps you can verify that the liquid composition is not changing with the increased throughput; that is probably be the only significant change that could occur.

Fire - Gas Expansion
This case deals with gas-full pressure vessels.  As with the vapor generation case, I would perhaps look to see if the increased 130% throughput leads to differing gas compositions in each vessel.  If not, there's probably no reason to resize the valve.

Of course, if you swap out any vessels with larger-sized replacements, you will definitely need to resize those valves.

RE: Fire case Relief

I think the answer is yes, because the wetted area in the vessels are changing, and the heat rates, too.

RE: Fire case Relief

(OP)
Thanks Jefka.

In this case we are not changing any vessel. The only thing which might change is the composition which will change the latent heat of boiling and hence the relief.Same goes with the gas case also.
I have a related querry in use of HYSYS depressuring utility for estimating the gas blowby case relief rate. Have you used it for relief estimations and if yes what has been your experience? In my case, it is predicting lower number than I got doing hand calculation (in excel) using Fisher control handbook method.I also selected Fisher method in HYSYS.

Sav

RE: Fire case Relief

(OP)
Hi Ajs,
I just posted my reply to Jefka's post only to see yours was posted also.
I am wondering if you could perhaps elaborte a little more about increase in wetted area and heat rate. I think the wetted area stays the same because it in a way is indicative of hold up volume in the vessel which would be heated in case of fire. The increase in plant rate will not change this unless the operating pressure (for gasses) or liquid levels are changed and also compositions change (which in turn lead to an increase in hold up volume and/or change in latent heat).
Thanks
Sav
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources