×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Architectural Masonry

Architectural Masonry

Architectural Masonry

(OP)
I recently designed a two storey steel framed shopping centre with the provision for an extra floor some time in the future. Having no specifiaction for the external cladding i allowed for an angle section at first floor around the perimeter of the building to catch the outer leaf of cladding at second floor and future third floor. I included for this as a masonry block with compressive strength 3.5N/mm2 would not have been adequate to carry the upper lifts of masonry under lateral and gravity loads. Once the job started on site i received a specification from the architect for an Architectural Masonary unit with a compressive strength 7.0N/mm2 I then decided to omitt the steel angle at first floor level as this masonry unit is capable of supportting three lifts of blockwork.
My dilema is that the client is mantaining that i should not have included the angle in the first place and that i was trying to cost him money. Does any one know where i can obtain literture specifiying a 3.5n/mm2 Architectural Masonry unit so i my justify my inital asssumtions to him.
He's a very difficult client.  

Kieran

RE: Architectural Masonry

The American Standard for non-loadbearing concrete masonry units, ASTM C-129, specifies a minimum compressive strength requirement of 500 psi (3.5 MPa).  ASTM C-129 covers both hollow and solid CMU.

As you have a steel frame, with the masonry serving as non-loadbearing cladding only, you can make a good argument for the 3.5 N/mm^2 assumption that you used.

Please note, however, that the CMUs covered by ASTM C-129 are not for exterior use in freeze/thaw conditions without protection.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources