×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cathodic Protection for Subsea Structure Piling

Cathodic Protection for Subsea Structure Piling

Cathodic Protection for Subsea Structure Piling

(OP)
Hello everyone,

My question is this:

For a subsea open end pile, is there a recommended limit to the pile depth which contributes to the structure's buried surface area (and therefore its current drain)?

The DNV-RP-B401 addresses pile contribution to the structure's submerged surface area in the following:

"For open pile ends, the top internal surface shall be included for a distance of 5 times the diameter and shall be regarded as seawater exposed."

There is no similar prescription for evaluating the surface of the buried end up to a specific depth.

Surely, the buried pile surface area is not evaluated across its entire depth, correct? I would assume that after a depth of at most 20 or 30m, the corrosive effects of salt water would be inhibited.

Thank you.

RE: Cathodic Protection for Subsea Structure Piling

Read the first sentence of 6.9.2.  It does not make the same assumption that you are making.  Naturally, you are still free to make that assumption in your design.  It is not a question of whether there is corrosion, it is a question of whether the design can accommodate the current that will be drawn by the metallic structure.  You might find your anodes wearing out a little more quickly than you planned even if you aren't expecting any corrosion, and then what will you do for the rest of the structure?

Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/8/83b/b04
 

RE: Cathodic Protection for Subsea Structure Piling

(OP)
Thanks Steve,

That makes sense. In order to prevent any corrosion on the structure, the driving potential between the pile and sediment would have to be negated regardless of whether iron is actually oxidizing at the buried end of the pile. This is my understanding of your response at least.  

RE: Cathodic Protection for Subsea Structure Piling

you're correct, below a certain depth there will be no oxygen and the corrosion rate will be negligible. i'm not aware of any standard that set a limit but i think that 20-30 mt is a good assumption.

S

Corrosion & Rust Prevention Control
 

RE: Cathodic Protection for Subsea Structure Piling

Not quite.  The DNV document is simply, possibly arbitrarily, accounting for the current that could be drawn by the pile surface in sizing the sacrificial anodes or the impresssed current system.  It is not advocating that this current is required for corrosion protection.

Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/8/83b/b04
 

RE: Cathodic Protection for Subsea Structure Piling

here is no similar prescription for evaluating the surface of the buried end up to a specific depth.

Eng Tips Rocks

thanks,
kk
http://cubuilt.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources