Autopipe vs CAESAR II Quality Assurance
Autopipe vs CAESAR II Quality Assurance
(OP)
I work in the nuclear business (Dept. of Enegy not NRC) and all of our software applications are subject to strict software QA requirements. Autopipe makes a great deal of mention of nuclear quality assurance on their website, but I don't see the same emphasis with CAESAR II.
Are there any quality assurance issues that would prevent using CAESAR II on a nuclear application?
Are there any quality assurance issues that would prevent using CAESAR II on a nuclear application?





RE: Autopipe vs CAESAR II Quality Assurance
Richard Ay
COADE, Inc.