Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.


Autopipe vs CAESAR II Quality Assurance

Autopipe vs CAESAR II Quality Assurance

I work in the nuclear business (Dept. of Enegy not NRC) and all of our software applications are subject to strict software QA requirements.  Autopipe makes a great deal of mention of nuclear quality assurance on their website, but I don't see the same emphasis with CAESAR II.  

Are there any quality assurance issues that would prevent using CAESAR II on a nuclear application?

RE: Autopipe vs CAESAR II Quality Assurance

CAESAR II is heavily QA'd, but the CAESAR II QA program doesn't meet the NQA-1 criteria at the present time.

Richard Ay

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close