×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

truss panel point analysis

truss panel point analysis

truss panel point analysis

(OP)
This is an existing connection that I'm analyzing for the ability to carry addtional load, but I'm having trouble determining which forces to include in the analysis.  The connection has a top chord consisting of (2)C15x33.9 back to back, a vertical web member consisting of (2)L6x4x1/2, and a diagonal web member consisting of (2)L6x4x1/2.  The gusset plate is 38" long by 33.5" wide, is sandwiched between the (2)C15x33.9, and extends to the top of the C15's.  The plate is attached to the C15's by (14) rivets erratically spaced.  The vertical web member is in compression and the diagonal is in tension.  Only the neutral axes of the web members intersect.  

My question is, what forces should be considered when analyzing the plate's connection to the C15's for additional load?  The largest force from the web members, moment (due to both tension & compression being present), or both?

RE: truss panel point analysis

CTW,

How are the vertical and diagonal members connected to the gusset plate?  Are also riveted?  Or are they welded?

I assume that, either riveted or welded, the connections of the vertical and diagonal members are concentric with their respective axes, and that the forces in these two members are transferred to the gusset plate without introducing additional moments.    Notice that the vertical components of these two forces cancel each other at the panel point, while the horizontal component of the diagonal is transmitted from the gusset plate to the 2-channel chord.
Notice too, that the axial force in the chord coming from the previous panel point continues through the channels and is not transferred to the gusset plate.

If my assumption is correct, then the erratically spaced rivets that connect the 2-channel chord to the gusset have to transfer the horizontal component of the diagonal (applied at the panel point) to the chord.  If the c.g. of the rivets is on the axis of the chord, the force is distributed equally between these rivets, and not moment is introduced into the joint.    

If the c.g. of the rivets is not in the axis of the chord, the shear in the rivets varies, and there is a moment introduced into the joint.    This moment is resisted by the chord and the web members, and has to be considered.

Hope this will help

AEF

RE: truss panel point analysis

CTW,

Before you try to analyze the connection, I feel you may perhaps analyze the truss itself for the loading, you intend to apply. You may run this on any FEM software with joint conditions as Pinned and then again as fixed. Generally, the first case produces heavy axial loads in truss members. The second case gives moments in addition to axial forces. This will give you a clear idea of the axial foreces or moments which can be anticipated if joint is rigid or pinned.

I hope it makes some sense.

flame

RE: truss panel point analysis

(OP)
Thank you both for your comments and suggestions.  

Flame-

The first thing I did was run this on the computer as pinned and fixed to get the forces.  I just overcomplicated the analysis of the connection as I have never encountered such an odd spacing and arrangement of rivets.  I didn't want to miss a force that should have been considered.

dlew-

You cleared that up for me.  The connections of the web members to the gusset are riveted.  Your assumptions were correct.  I now see that the vertical forces cancel each other and I'm left with the horizontal force.  The c.g. of the rivets is on the axis of the channels. Thanks for helping me see how simple this situation actually is.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources