×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Neglecting Passive Pressure in Frost Depth

Neglecting Passive Pressure in Frost Depth

Neglecting Passive Pressure in Frost Depth

(OP)
When calculating the passive resistance of the soil below the frost depth is it proper to consider the passive pressure based on the actual depth or should the passive pressure be calculated on the actual depth minus the frost depth?

For example if the frost depth is 2' and my passive pressure is 200 psf/ft.  Does my passive pressure below the frost line begin at 400 psf and the triangular pressure area above is ignored or does it begin at 0 and I begin a triangular pressure curve from there?

RE: Neglecting Passive Pressure in Frost Depth

I've seen this "ignoring contribution of soils in the frost depth" but I've never heard a valid explanation as to why. I practice in an area where design frost depth is 10 feet. When frozen, soils have increased strength, generally. Only when thawing is there a loss of bearing strength due to excess water/saturated layers. And there may be a small decrease in density if soils were fully saturated, then subject to freezing. I think you could just use a reduced strength in the frost zone, but about the same unit weights.

RE: Neglecting Passive Pressure in Frost Depth

I always discount the upper 2 ft of burial on passive pressures, just because folks seem to like digging. To me it's added safety factor (just coincidentally our frost depth is also about 2 ft).

f-d

¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!

RE: Neglecting Passive Pressure in Frost Depth

If you are simply correcting for the loss of strength during thawing, treat the soil in the frost zone as a surcharge.  The passive pressure at the frost depth is equal to the overburden pressure times the passive pressure coefficient.  For your example, yes, start the pressure diagram at 400 psf. This is still conservative, because the pressure in the top 2 feet is rarely zero.  You should be safe also if someone excavates a narrow trench 2 feet deep along your wall.

Of course, if there is a chance that the top two feet will actually be excavated, the pressure diagram will be reduced by 400 psf.   

RE: Neglecting Passive Pressure in Frost Depth

(OP)
Thank you for the responses.  texan, this does seem like a reasonable approach to me, you worded it better than I did.  I agree I would have to make an assessment of the likelihood of excavation.  In a case I am working on now there is going to be a parking lot paved right up against the building so I could feel relatively good about it not being excavated.  Other situations might not be as protected from digging.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources