×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

(OP)
I am quite unfamiliar with cellular beams and I am looking for a way in which to calculate the warping torsion constant Cw.

I am aware that for symmetrical I and H sections the following formula can be applied:

Cw = (Iy.h^2)/4

Can this be adapted to accommodate the cross section of a cellular beam?

 

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

Cw = 0.0 for Hollow Structural Sections.

BA

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

I'm not sure that I agree with BA retired.  I recall doing some relatively complex torsion calculations back in college for an aerospace course.... Which is the only time I've worked on members with a multi-celled cross section.  That is the type of member that you're getting at, right StaVis?  

I'm fairly confident that BAretired is correct for all standard pipes and tube that AISC uses.  But, I'm just not sure about the odd mult-celled cross sections that you get in other fields.   

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

Can you provide a cross section of the shape you are using?

BA

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

(OP)
Thanks, I appreciate the feedback, but perhaps I posed my question ambiguously. To rephrase: I am considering a standard steel I beam with voids in its web. Please see the attachment for an example.

I'm looking for a method to calculate this constant without the use of software if possible.

Any suggestions regarding useful literature would be much appreciated as well.  

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

BA-
I believe a "cellular" beam is the same as a castellated beam

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

Blodgett section 4.7 covers open web beams....not sure about Cw however.
 

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

Strange, they are/were called castellated in the UK and here. I haven't heard them called cellular, before, I thought of cellular deck and assumed similarity.

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

Pad-
The only difference I can think between Castellated and Cellular is Castellated are cut and welded from one beam where Cellular maybe simply a beam with holes cut in the web with no welding as seen in a Castellated beam.....just guessing here.  

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

I misinterpreted the meaning of cellular beam.  Cw for a regular WF (wide flange beam) is given as:

Cw = tfh2b3/24

Since this expression does not involve web thickness, it seems to me that Cw is the same for a castellated beam.

BA

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

BA-
I was thinking the same thing, but haven't had a chance to look it up.  

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

Toad,

I have never calculated Cw for a castellated beam, but it seems to make sense that it should be the same as for a WF, H or I section.  The top flange bends in one direction while the bottom flange bends in the other when the section is exposed to torsion.  

The web plays no role in warping, but it does contribute to torsional resistance and is included in the 'J' term.

BA

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

BA-
Makes sense to me.  

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

(OP)
Thanks for the all the help. After all of this I'm rather curious as to how this constant was derived, as I've realised that I obviously don't understand it all too well. Will probably have to do some digging in the old classic elastic theory, as I suspect the formulae given in the codes etc are just safe approximations. But thanks again.

Yes, one could say that Cellular beams are the modern version of Castellated beams - they are fabricated in much the same way (also by flame cutting and then welding). I think the Cellular beams are possibly easier to bend (done before welding) to form curved or precambered members.

For interest's sake, I've included a picture showing the cutting pattern.

RE: Warping constant (Cw) of cellular beams

An interesting pattern, giving the most of inner diameter for mechanical services. From the structural viewpoint it also has as good the elimination of corners of the typical hexagonal/octogonal patterns, with the only drawback of weakened chords relative to the hexagonal cut, what is not much if limiting to reasonable use the members.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources