×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Forces on Rotating Member

Forces on Rotating Member

Forces on Rotating Member

(OP)
As part of a valve analysis I am looking at a swinging disc arm.  I have not done an analysis like this for a while so I am using a previous calc (not done by me) as a guide.  The portion I am looking at right now considers the bending moment acting on the arm as a function of distance from the pivot caused by the inertia of the arm (it's a pretty big valve). I have a number of reactions while looking at this.  First, the original calculator (the person, not the program) defines the bending moment at X as "the moment caused by that portion of the arm to the right of x" (where the pivot is to the left of x).  At first this makes sense because if you are considering inertia the more of the bulk of the arm involved the higher it should be.  But then, this also means that at X=0 the moment is highest which seems counter-intuitive.  This is complicated further (at least in my head) by the fact that the pivot is at the lower corner of the arm as opposed to being located along the central axis.  So my questions is this:

How do I consider inertial moment as a function of distance from the pivot when the pivot is offset from the members central axis?

Please explain what this means physically as it is somehow eluding me.

 

RE: Forces on Rotating Member

Hi mechie17

Might I suggest you post a picture, you know clearly in your mind what your describing but unfortunately we don't.

desertfox

RE: Forces on Rotating Member

Please state the dynamic conditions and the engineering requirement.

For example, a torque is delivered to the arm in order to close it in t seconds and you need to know the value of that torque and perhaps the stresses induced in the member.

Absent the conditions and requirements, we can't comment on the solution as presented.
 

RE: Forces on Rotating Member

(OP)
I apologize.  I think I was having a hard time verbalizing what exactly it was I wanted to know.  I will try again.  Attached is a simplified diagram of my system.  I have a massive beam attached at it's lower left hand corner to a pivot.  The beam is held horizontal at time=0 and released, allowing it's weight to swing it downward.  I have the beams mass moment of inertia and both the speed and acceleration values at the moment in time I am considering.  I know then that the torque produced by this falling beam is Torque = MOI * acceleration.  So I want to understand how this calculated number relates to bending moments experienced internally at the beam cross sections along the length of the beam.  In other words, how do I find the bending moment due to inertial acceleration at any section in the beam? As far as the pivot location is concerned I guess I am wondering how the internal bending moments change (if they do) since the pivot is not located along the centroid which is the typical location of the neutral axis.

RE: Forces on Rotating Member

First off, in all my experience I never saw the need to analyze the stresses in  a structural member rotating due to  its own gravity. The stresses have to be very small. So this looks like an academic problem.

Now, the original calculation you mention is essentially correct in that you sum the induced moments to the right of the x point  The offset center will effectively cause the inertial loading to be oblique to the beam centerline so the shear diagram would have a sine@ factor at each segment along the beam and the orthogonal cos@ factor would cause a compressive stress in the beam.

So, if you do this classically, develop a loading diagram normal to the beam which is the inertial forces on each segment multiplied by the sine term from which you get the flexural stress
MC/I.
To this add the compressive component.

You also have the centrifugal component which will add tension in the beam, which should also be small.

 

RE: Forces on Rotating Member

Hi mechie17

If its a valve part your analsysing isn't there more to it than an arm falling under gravity?
I can see that stresses could be induced in the arm but only if it was closed under some resistance, I can't imagine a huge valve being allowed to slam shut under gravity can you please expand on the problem some more.

desertfox

RE: Forces on Rotating Member

(OP)
Alright, I apologize again.  I was misunderstanding the physical nature of what I was calculating.  I had previously determined the force put on the arm due to the valve disc's rotation (due to a differential pressure).  So what I needed to do was find the bending caused by the torque on the arm.  Thank you for trying to assist me despite my lack of clarity.  My issue seems to have resolved itself through the act of learning more about the question I was trying to ask.

RE: Forces on Rotating Member

Nothing wrong with wanting to learn more. My thought throughout the complicated discussion was what you were wondering about relevant. Surely the material specifications of your system come into play ? Was the massive beam made of a material that would be affected by bending stresses at the loads you were subjecting it to ? All materials have a lower limit at which no discernible change is apparent. then they move through a stage, a bending moment, at a specific rate according to "variables" and they will have a maximum tolerance point at which they will snap. It would be helpfull in future to specify the materials involved.

I am glad you have resolved your problem through thought. Indeed, it is said Nikola Tesla never began work on a project until he had every aspect fully considered and balanced. Wise words if true.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources