×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Mixing of welding processes/electrodes

Mixing of welding processes/electrodes

Mixing of welding processes/electrodes

(OP)
I am a CWI working under AWS D1.1 almost %100 of the time and I have a question. Is there anywhere in the code that directly prohibits the use of both SMAW E7018 and FCAW E71T-8 electrodes to compile the same weld? A contractor is proposing to tack weld with E7018 and complete final welding with E71T-8. I think the obvious solution from an inspector's stand point would be, "please show me your WPS for this," since table 4.5 item# 4 under filler metal says that a WPS written for classification A5.1 would not be applicable to a weld performed under classification A5.20 and vice-versa. However, I am asking from more of a structural and metallurgical standpoint as it might be possible to perform a WPS qualification using the two processes. Any help would be appreciated...

RE: Mixing of welding processes/electrodes

Since you work with D1.1 most of the time I assume you have a copy to review.

Both FCAW and SMAW are prequalified processes. The contractor can write a WPS that uses the processes in any combinatin provided all the other provisions of prequalification are met.  

Best regards - Al  

RE: Mixing of welding processes/electrodes

(OP)
I am not 100 percent sure that the first remark is not useless sarcasm. Like I previously stated I do work with D1.1, and I am familiar with what is contained within that code. I already figured that a WPS could be written to support such combinations that is why I even included a statement saying so, also like previously stated I was asking whether or not there are any drawbacks from mainly a structural or metallurgical standpoint.  

RE: Mixing of welding processes/electrodes

It wasn't meant to be sarcasm. It was meant to a polite way to say you need to get a copy if you don't already have one. You would be surprised to know how many times I encounter contractors and inspectors that don't even know the color of the cover.

E7018 is a safe bet for nearly any application provided it is a matching filler metal for the steel being welded.

There are times when the flux of the FCAW weld will be dificult to completely remove when the FCAW passes over the tack. Other than that, no problem I am aware of.  

Best regards - Al  

RE: Mixing of welding processes/electrodes

Structurally I don't see any problem.  Both processes are using the same filler metal and are even self-shielded.  I do not think AWS D1.1 requires that the welds and tack welds be completed by the same process.  For example backing is frequently tack welded using SMAW E7018, then the weld is completed using SAW or other weld process.  The WPS used to apply the tack weld is independent of the WPS for the completed weld.  As a CWI, you may request written verification from the EOR.

If I recall this is in the fabrication section of D1.1, Chapter 5.  5.18 or somewhere close.  Sorry I am answering on my cellphone.    

http://www.FerrellEngineering.com

RE: Mixing of welding processes/electrodes

Combining FCAW-S with other processes can be iffy.  D1.1 doesn't consider it to be much of a problem for ordinary applications, but see D1.1-2008 Table 4.14 footnote a for special requirements in applications requiring Charpy testing.

Hg

Eng-Tips policies:  FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources