×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Tiny Orifice Plate Sizing

Tiny Orifice Plate Sizing

Tiny Orifice Plate Sizing

(OP)
I'm sizing an orifice plate for flow reduction, as the upstream (on/off) dump valve has a very large CV and we're concerned about emptying the tank before the operator can close the valve.

Using equations from McCabe, Smith, & Harriott I solve directly for the beta ratio, which comes out to be 0.06 for the desired flow.  The pipe size is 0.5" tubing, and the orifice hole, therefore, is 0.03".  This gives me a Reynolds number of 8566 in the upstream pipe, which, according to the literature, should cause me to look closely to the value for C that I am using.

Since I am not measuring flow, but simply trying to reduce the rate, is this anything to be concerned about?

Thanks for the help!

Onwards,

Matt

RE: Tiny Orifice Plate Sizing

If choices exist in the equations or program, assure that you select pipe taps not orifice flanges.  Pipe taps assures permanent loss.  Orifice taps would measure across the vena contracta but most pressure recovers after an orifice plate.

RE: Tiny Orifice Plate Sizing

(OP)
JL,

Thanks for the advice.  There are no options for this; it's my own spreadsheet using an equation from the literature.

I ran a couple demo programs over the weekend and I'm spot on with FE-Sizer, so I figure I'm OK.  Since we're just trying to slow the flow, this should suffice.

Onwards,

Matt

RE: Tiny Orifice Plate Sizing

Personally I've always preferred a metering valve to a fixed orifice personally.  That way, when it plugs, you can always open it a bit more to clear the blockage and get the thing drained.  Costs about the same as a filter upstream of the orifice, and way more effective.  Don't want the operator to fiddle with it?  Adjust and then remove the handle...

Begs the question:  why are you using 1/2" tubing if you can tolerate that much pressure drop?  Why not a smaller valve and 1/4" heavy wall tubing?

RE: Tiny Orifice Plate Sizing

(OP)
moltenmetal,

I think the metering valve is a great suggestion; I wasn't familiar with those previous to your post.

Probably could go with 1/4" tubing all the way to the downstream drum, but it's already installed and replacing that tubing, and the associated heat trace, would be expensive and delay things.

I like the metering valve option.  Have a star!

Onwards,

Matt

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources