×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Masonry Wall Design

Masonry Wall Design

Masonry Wall Design

(OP)
Looking at designing a load bearing, masonry wall in a high wind area.  Wind Load is 37psf, wall is 17' tall.  For the sake of simplicity for my question, I'm treating the roof load as negligible and only using wind loads.  

Going through the TEK manual, I get a #5 @ 24" o.c. from the allowable stress design tables.

**16,039lb-in/ft required, 16,420lb-in/ft provided

When I do strength design per ACI530...I get (without any reductions, yet)...33,374lb-in/ft provided.  The formula I used is Mn=(Asfy)(d-(a/2))

I thought maybe instead of fy=60,000psi, I should've used Fs=24,000psi but that yields 14,118lb-in/ft.  Do the 2 methods yield these drastically different results or have I made a mistake?  I also cannot seem to "back calculate" the allowable stress tables.  

Thanks for the attention.  JEW

RE: Masonry Wall Design

For Masonry I do believe you should be using Fs=24,000 psi.
Are you sure you are using the proper equation from ACI-530?
I think you should be using EQN 2-17 or 2-18.  

RE: Masonry Wall Design

Toad, he is talking about strength design. Ch 2 is for ASD.

RE: Masonry Wall Design

ah...my apologies.  

RE: Masonry Wall Design

(OP)
The equation I used is a strength design equation (chapter 3), not an asd equation (ch 2).  I used the table for the asd reinforcement.

I, too, thought I should use Fs, not fy, however eq 3-27 & 3-28 both use fy.  **3-27 and 3-28 are the equations I used to get the numbers above.  33,000 lb-in/ft is using fy and 14,000lb-in/ft is using Fs.  Makes a big difference!!

RE: Masonry Wall Design

I was thrown off by ..."I also cannot seem to "back calculate" the allowable stress tables"

RE: Masonry Wall Design

In strength design, you use ultimate loads (1.6 factor for wind). In ASD you use a 1.0 factor for Wind. I have not run the numbers, but the strength design and allowable design numbers are supposed to be different.

RE: Masonry Wall Design

You would use fy in the strength design equations, you use Fs in the ASD equations.  I would expect you to get a significantly higher moment capacity for strength design because you're comparing it to a factored load instead of a service level load.   

RE: Masonry Wall Design

I'm not so sure you can eliminate 'Pu' from your equations.
Ref. section 3.3.4.1.1

RE: Masonry Wall Design

(OP)
I can't eliminate Pu.  I am just doing this for the sake of education.  I am just trying to figure the best, most efficient way to design and build this wall.

I too see why the strength design is "stronger" than asd.  I realize it's not when you add in the factors.  Thanks for everyone's help.

RE: Masonry Wall Design

For what it's worth, unless the wall is load bearing (and carrying a lot) the axial load willl generally HELP the strength analysis (at least for strength design).

RE: Masonry Wall Design

(OP)
The wall is load bearing, the axial load, though, is insignificant.  (short span roof load)

RE: Masonry Wall Design

There is a benefit in using the "strength" design vs. ASD.  There are also a bunch of P-delta restrictions, maximum reinforcing restrictions and axial stress restrictions.  Once you fight through all of them, it's pretty much free capacity.
I only use the strength design allowables when I'm in pretty desperate straits.

RE: Masonry Wall Design

LRFD
-More "accurate"
-Much harder to do a quick calc by hand

ASD
-Proven to work for a long long time
-Easy to do a quick calc

They're not really related to each other at all.  It's an analog to concrete design (or steel design for that matter).  They're just two different methods of doing the same thing.  

With a taller, more slender wall (h/t>30), the strength method may be the only option as the ASD method starts to get pretty conservative for slender walls.

Yes, the do yield different results.  As slickdeals said though, for strength design you have to multiply your wind by 1.6.  25,000 lb*in/ft demand versus  33,374 lb*in/ft capacity.  For ASD it was 16,039 vs 16,420. Not as drastic a difference as you had in your OP.   

RE: Masonry Wall Design

We need to establish here that the difference between  LRFD and ASD in masonry design is more than just load factors - it is also in the analysis methodology.  

LRFD is based on the ultimate strength methodology similar to concrete where Whitney's stress block is assumed and both the steel and masonry are brought to ultimate capacities to determine the nominal strength.  ASD is based on a simple elastic stress distribution using conservative allowable stress values.

I recently compared design results and there is a surprisingly large disparity between the two methods.  Apparently, you can get by with a lot less if you use LRFD to design masonry. It prompted me to started a thread about the noted difference as well.

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=258356&page=2

I still like to use ASD because the quality of masonry construction is so poor.  We have been making a significant efforts in recent months to crack down on special inspection requirements and idiot-proof some of our typical details to circumvent some problems.  However, there is only so much you can do when the masonry sub barely looks at your drawings.  You can't be out there every day.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources