×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Design of a stirrer
2

Design of a stirrer

Design of a stirrer

(OP)
I would like to know the recommendations of which design amongst the attached would be the best for :

** Creating a VORTEX and highest downward thrust (for pushing the fluid down towards a drain plug) when used as a stirrer...

 I would like to know if there are any better designs than the ones I have thought of for achieving my purpose. Thanks in advance

RE: Design of a stirrer

Look at boat propellor designs as a first thought.  What fluid and viscosities are you working with, and does it contain any solids, particulates, etc?

RE: Design of a stirrer

your design would produce minimal downward thrust ... a propeller is designed to produce thrust, so if this is your goal ... go with a propeller.

 

RE: Design of a stirrer

(OP)
A single propeller though would not probably produce enough thrust needed I believe. The issue is the polymer is less denser than water (0.9) so to push it down is an issue. Multiple propellers maybe @ different heights on the shaft???

 Would it be able to provide more homogenous mixing & probably thrust too???

RE: Design of a stirrer

it may well be buoyant, but a propeller will produce the maximum thrust, depending on the pitch angle of the blades and the power provided.  multiple propellers won't help much, if at all ... they're used in aircraft to recover the swirl of the fwd propeller and to increase the power for a given diameter (given that tip speed is limited).

you may consider shaping the bottom of the container, which might help the flow circulate.

are you trying to mix the fluids ?  maybe work it from both sides ... one propeller pushing the lighter fluid down, another pushing the heavier fluid up ??

RE: Design of a stirrer

(OP)
thanks....gr8 info...actually there are not 2 fluids...1 is water and the other is polymer melt (insoluble in water)...I was thinking of ordering the regular mixing left hand propellers to push the melt down...now maybe the best bet would be as recommended to put a propeller to push melt down (probably @ the top of the shaft) & another propeller on the shaft bottom (put the other way or right handed) to push water up...

 Am just worried though that the bottom propeller might push the melt upwards or a single propeller @ bottom might not be sufficient to create the thrust we need in a large chamber...

  Shaping the bottom of the chamber might work out great....have to though probably consider re-designing the whole chamber which would be costly....

RE: Design of a stirrer

Why don't you skim from the surface, if that's where the polymer is?

RE: Design of a stirrer

i think he trying to mix them, even thought they don't want to mix ...

it'd be easy to separate them.

random thought d'jour ... could you heat the mixture slightly ?? (to encourage them to get along with each other)

RE: Design of a stirrer

(OP)
No No.....I believe i was not able to get my message across more clearly......aim is not to mix them.....Water is just used as a dispersing agent for heat dispersion.....

 Skimming is not possible as the chamber is a pressure vessel which is closed....Mixture is heated till 150 C so that the polymer is melted...

 Aim is to get the melt out of the chamber to room pressure via the valve @ the chamber bottom so that the polymer will expand due to pressure differential....Water is essential though so that the material is not overheated......

Due to density difference though water gushes out first from the valve rather than the polymer so we need to make sure it is being thrusted down and forced out...

RE: Design of a stirrer

How about an Archimedes screw running in a downward direction towards your outlet?

B.E.

RE: Design of a stirrer

(OP)
wont the archimedes screw pull up my material as well??? The issue is polymer is dispersed in water and I believe the screw will just pull everything up....I want the material to be pushed out(down) - water is secondary : If it comes out after the material = NO ISSUES...but if it sneaks out before it...my expanded material would collapse because of the chamber heat!

RE: Design of a stirrer

ajxxx
 Remember this screw is pushing your material down.
 The screw will pull a column of polymer water mix towards your outlet, some of your material will escape the sides of the screw and recirculate in the tank. A sleeve around part of the screw at the bottom will minimise that. Remember this screw would have to be centered over your outlet to work
 What stops your water from draining out and leaving your polymer high and dry? do you open a valve in the bottom of the tank and let the water flash to wet steam? are you re-filling as you drain?
 Is this a continuous flow,  or a batch production system ?
If this is a batch production system then a tapered bottom to the tank will give you a better discharge. However I feel that if the flow rate is too slow your polymer will agglomerate in your tank.
B.E.

RE: Design of a stirrer

(OP)
Yes there is a valve @ the bottom of the tank... No re-filling is done while draining - point is to get an instant release to subject the polymer to a high pressure differential required for expansion.
 
 This is batch production system. Polymer tends to agglomerate but we are using surfactants to prevent that issue. I am giving the propellers a shot today as other coveted members have recommended.

 Would also try to get the archimedes screw and give it a try if needed - any recommended companies to buy/customize the archimedes screw?

 I need to somehow add resistance to the water flow to slow it down because it escapes far more easily than the polymer melt.

 Info that all of you have provided though has been a big help and am in a much more better position than before for sure. Big thanks and please continue to assist with your recommendations if possible.

RE: Design of a stirrer

if you heat the mixture to 150C ... isn't the water converted into steam ?  or do you have a really high pressure ?

 

RE: Design of a stirrer

(OP)
pressure is 600 psi so water still remains in liquid form.

RE: Design of a stirrer

(OP)
and pressure is in the form of CO2(carbon dioxide) @ 600 Psi - CO2 serves as the blowing agent for expansion of polymer.

RE: Design of a stirrer

so you've got water (@150C and 600psi), CO2 (@ 600psi) and your polymer all being vented out of the tank, to atmosphere.  i think there's an awful lot of thermodynamics happening all at once !  the water is superheated, i'd've thought it would flash to steam; and that everything would get horribly mixed up as it comes out the vent.

it sounds like you're using the water as a heat sink ... could you use something else ?  maybe the water is also a transport agent ?

it sounds ike you want to do the opposite of mixing ... you want to separate the polymer from the water.  is the polymer still fluid at say 90C and 1atm ?  reduce the temp, reduce the pressure, get a more controlled release ??

RE: Design of a stirrer

(OP)
I have water with polymer in it and CO2 is purged @ 600 psi + "so called mixture" is heated to 150 C and saturated for 1 hour.

 Water is both heat sink & transport agent - favoured for use because of cost and no chemical reactions.

 No i cannot lower the temp. as the polymer melts @ 150 C...once it melts it absorbs the gas and becomes unstable...once vented to the atmosphere the pressure differential causes it to expand. Polymer achieves "fluidity" @ 150 so it helps in coming out easily with water.

Would metering valves or say a spiral tube @ the bottom port enable me to add more resistance to control the release and also help me provide more resistance to water flow?

RE: Design of a stirrer

Call me crazy, but it seems that with the system you have here, you're trying to make it overly complicated.  Instead of trying to push the polymer down through the water and get it out through the hole in the bottom of the tank, try this: Put a tube inside the tank with the bottom connected to the bulkhead in the bottom of the tank and have the top end of the open tube a few inches from the top of the tank.  Then you just pump water into the tank so that all of the polymer comes out through the tube.  You would need a second hole in the bottom so that you can drain the water after you're done.  

If the way I explained it didn't make any sense, open a toilet tank and have a look at the overflow tube.  

And now that I think about it, at that pressure and temperature, you can simply put a valve on the bottom and let it flow on its own without having to pump anything into it.   

Engineering is not the science behind building.  It is the science behind not building.   

RE: Design of a stirrer

ET,
i don't think he's trying to push the ploymer through the water, but rather trying to separate the water (drive it to the bottom of the receiving tank) and the polymer (drive it to the top of the tank).

it sounds like the water and the polymer mix (at 600psi and 150C).  but i'm confused by "the polymer melts @ 150 C...once it melts it absorbs the gas and becomes unstable".

i also have difficulty with venting to atmoshpere a vessel at 150C and 600psi containing a water mixture.  this isn't my speciality but isn't the water superheated ? won't it (does it ?) flash to steam ??  won't the 600psi drive the mixture out the vent (something like an enema) ?

is the polymer mixed in with the water ? evenly distributed or globby ??

RE: Design of a stirrer

a random thought ... i've been thinking about the mixture in the receiving vessel ... maybe you're looking for something to help get the mixture out of the oven ? (if you make a vortex the fluid flows much quicker out of the outlet) ... maybe you should create a circulation inside the oven ??

RE: Design of a stirrer

(OP)
No infact it is the other way around...water should be pushed up and polymer down(polymer is more lighter)...based on the water table though water density @ 150 C & 600 psi would be 0.91 ----almost equal to that of the polymer melt.

Polymer is evenly distributed in water (agglomeration is prevented by use of talc / surfactant).

Water is used as a transport agent "to" the valve where it is discharged...after discharge water is not important but is critical before that to help drive the polymer to the exit (besides also helping as a dispersing agent during saturation which generates heat due to exothermic polymerization process).

Polymer & Water are "Immisscible" - polymer does not dissolve in water....just floats around and based on water table @ higher temp. evenly "moves" with water (not @ top as densities become same)...

Maybe just my communication is bad as probably I am not being able to explain it properly .....this process is termed "Pre-expansion Of Polypropylene beads (EPP)" in an autoclave.

RE: Design of a stirrer

so the polymer is floating on top of the water ... i'd try a flexible hose, with the end floating at the water interface, sucking the polymer out ...

RE: Design of a stirrer

Why not just put the hole in the top, or near the top, of the tank?   

RE: Design of a stirrer

i googled EPP ad got a whole host of hits ... there's a well established indutry/technology out there (KURTZ seems to be prominent).  i doubt that a bunch a guys dispensing free advice will get you where you want to go.  i can't suggest that you infringe on someone else's copyright, so i won't !

RE: Design of a stirrer

Think of this as mixing salad oil and vinegar.
If you let it sit, the oil will float on the vinegar.
When you shake it up well, the two will mix temporarily.
ajxxx wants to get the mixture out of the vessel while it is still mixed up.
B.E.

RE: Design of a stirrer

No, he wants the polymer to come out without the rush of steam/hot water.  The polymer will have absorbed water/steam and CO2 under pressure, and these absorbed materials cause the pellets to expand.  The external, un-absorbed water just flashes/splashes away and presumably causes trouble.

At least that was my read.

And thus my suggestion to pull the pellets off the top of the kettle, where they are floating...

RE: Design of a stirrer

Quote (ajxxx):

water is secondary : If it comes out after the material = NO ISSUES

I must be missing something here.  I will admit that I had trouble with the file that he uploaded (100% a problem on my end) but either way, I must be failing to grasp what the problem is if he can't have a standpipe in the vessel, where he pumps more water into the bottom to force the polymer out through the tube.  Or perhaps trying the floating tube as rb1957 suggested.  

What I had said before is that you would have the end of the tube a few inches below the top of the vessel, but this would be wrong.  My thinking is that if you are making this in batches, you determine where the height of the water-polymer interface will be and set the end of the tube to be at exactly this height.  Each batch, you add (ECACTLY) enough water to cover - JUST BARELY - the end of the pipe, then you add however much polymer you need for the batch and the space above the polymer will be filled with steam.  

When you open your valve at the bottom of the tank, the polymer is pushed out until you get steam throttling through the valve.  To maximize the amount of polymer coming out, you might try having a funnel shape on the upper end of the inner standpipe, up to almost the full diameter of the inside of the tank.  

If that wouldn't work, then I have to say that I have no idea what's going on.   

Engineering is not the science behind building.  It is the science behind not building.   

RE: Design of a stirrer

The problem with a standpipe, or a floating hose, or whatever, i.e. an opening anywhere but at the top of the tank -- is that, as you deplete the polymer load, you must make up the missing space, presumably as ETex says, by adding water.  But, this means that the water level must rise to make up the volume left by the polymer that has been removed.  At some point, the water level will rise above a standpipe, and all that comes out is steam, with some amount of remaining polymer floating in the top of the tank.  If a floating hose, then the volume might be smaller, but there will still be some residual.  

A single hole in the top of the tank seems to be the way to go.  Or else I have no idea what's going on either.

RE: Design of a stirrer

i'd've thought that the pressure would drop slightly (less stuff filling the same volume) as the polymer is removed.

but like i said, people have examined this problem in detail and arrived at workable solutions, after investing way more effort and thought than we're likely to put in.  And i'd expect that all the ideas we're "pop-corning" have been considered already and incorporated or rejected.

just my 2c ...

RE: Design of a stirrer

Is the water necessary to the reaction? As I understand the problem statement it is being used as a conductor within the tank. Could you change from that to another material maybe something solid which you could strain out as the polymer exits the tank?

RE: Design of a stirrer

I think btrueblood's got it right; move the gravity vector instead of fighting it.

 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources