×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NOAA Atlas vs Reality

NOAA Atlas vs Reality

NOAA Atlas vs Reality

(OP)
Hi,

Has anyone out there had any luck convincing NOAA that in certain cases their rainfall Atlas might be a bit too aggressive.  We have a project that requires a 100 year storm.  The value from the NOAA Atlas for the area in question says the 100 year 24 hour storm value is 3.2 inches.  The 10 year 24 hour storm is 2.2 inches.  I used extreme care in transferring lat and long to the NOAA maps so misreading the map is not the problem

The area is desert.  Rain gage data starting May 1, 1958 shows that the largest storm in 51-1/2 years was 1.88 inches on Jan 21, 1984.  It seems unlikely that their isopluvials are accurate if there has not been even one 10 year storm in the last 50.5 years.  

Alternatively has anyone ever convinced FEMA that the NOAA Atlas is not always correct?  

I am not holding my breath but I was just curious.

Thanks

RE: NOAA Atlas vs Reality

Was the largest storm of 1.88 inches in 24 hours?

Statistical analysis on more than 50 years of data should be adequate for 100 years.



Do you have access to the yearly peak 24 rainfall? If yes, you could perform such an analysis (e.g. with Log-Pearson Type III Distribution) and then contact FEMA with the results?

RE: NOAA Atlas vs Reality

(OP)
Hi SMIAH,

That is a great suggestion.  As usual you are always ready to help.  I have read a lot of your answers to other people's questions too.

Yes I have the daily 24 hour rainfall peaks for every day since May 1, 1958 except for a few rare days when the gage did not get read for some reason.  

Can you recommend a reference for the Log-Pearson Type III Distr?

Thanks,
dpajr

RE: NOAA Atlas vs Reality

(OP)
Hi SMIAH,

I found several tutorials for log-Pearson.

Thanks,
dpajr

RE: NOAA Atlas vs Reality

before you get too carried away, the values you quote are not un-reasonable for the US desert southwest (which is where I assume you are located). I did a little search and only found two gages at Death Valley and Barstow that were listed with less rainfall for the 100-year, 24-hour storm than what you list. For Barstow, the 100-year, 6-hour storm was 1.9 inches which is what you observed in 1984. Perhaps 1984 was approximately equivalent to a 100-year, 6-hour storm...

Quite a few areas which I would consider to be among the dryest in the country including Blythe, Brawley, Coyote Wells, Needles and Thermal all are listed with higher 100-year rainfall depths than what you have.


Bear in mind that you are looking at a single rain gage in the desert where rain gages are generally few and far between. Typical storms in the desert are small, intense thunderstorms which can very easily miss hitting your rain gage. NOAA uses all rain gages in the region, not just one.

Your 100-year rainfall could also occur in an hour, not 24-hours. You may want to use a 6-hour storm, not 24-hour.  

You might try finding a similar gage nearby to see if you can validate those numbers. Or another option is to use the regional regression equations for the area and see if that corresponds to the runoff you are calculating.  

RE: NOAA Atlas vs Reality

I'm with cvg.  Those isopluvials are based on all the rain gauges in a region, not on one gauge.  

To get to the meat of your question, though, why do you need to convince NOAA at all?  Are they your regulatory agency?  This seems like an argument to bring to whoever's doing your engineering review, not to the "keepers of the maps."  They're not likely to want to change their maps just for you, but you may be justified in adjusting your design storm based on historical data if you document your assumptions, do everything right, and get local government approval for your design procedure.  

As always, your goals are to design things that you think are safe, that you can defend in court, and that other folks will buy into.   

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East - http://www.campbellcivil.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources