INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

AS3600-2009

AS3600-2009

(OP)
Hi,

This is actually from previous versions of the code also, however Cl 8.1.10.4 (b) says that 1/4 of the midspan positive reo "shall continue past the near face of the support"

How come there is no distance prescribed? what does this mean? does 0.1mm past the face comply?

Thanks

RE: AS3600-2009

The commentary AS3600 Supp1-1994 shows the requirements in figure C8.1.8.5

It just shows the bars extending 'a bit' past the face, no dimension given.

I would use 50mm min.

RE: AS3600-2009

Note that provision only applies if you are using the simplified method of Cl 6.10.  Even if doing the analysis that way, I think the anchorage provisions of 8.1.10.4 should be complied with.

RE: AS3600-2009

(OP)
Thanks,

I guess it just needs enough that the closest shear tie has some anchorage

RE: AS3600-2009

demayeng,

That is a minimum requirement. If you have any condition like support settlement or large load reversals or if it is a roof slab with temperature differentials, basically anything that might put stress in the bottom near the support, I would lap the bars at the bottom! Doesn't cost much is is a lot safer.

Hokie66,

I disagree that this applies only if 6.10 is used!

RE: AS3600-2009

Right you are, rapt.  I had 8.1.10.4 and 8.1.10.6 confused.  They are a bit different, but I don't know why.

RE: AS3600-2009

hokie66,

8.1.10.4 must be satisfied for all designs.

8.1.10.6 is the minimum deemed to comply bar termination rules to be used where you do not actually do a full analysis and determine bending moment diagrams, points of contraflexure, etc and are therefore unable to calculate real termination requirements. ie when you use 6.10 to determine maximum -ve and +ve design bending moments.

But as I said, I would always at least provide a nominal lap on bottom bars, but that may be because of my PT experience.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close