Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Oil Storage Tank Level Indicator - Possible Static Buildup?

Oil Storage Tank Level Indicator - Possible Static Buildup?

Oil Storage Tank Level Indicator - Possible Static Buildup?

Hello all,

A project I am working on is to upgrade an oil/water decanting storage tank. There is currently an older name-brand level indicator installed on the tank. I'm not sure of the model, but I was told it has a wire that acts as a spring and moves up or down with the liquid.

My supervisor told me that this type of level indicator has been known to generate static electricty as a possible source for explosion/fire. Does anyone know of any literature that supports this? I have been all over Google and this forum and can't seem to find anything.

Thanks for the help.

James DeRosier
Engineering Co-op
University of Michigan

RE: Oil Storage Tank Level Indicator - Possible Static Buildup?

I think that this whole discussion should revolve around tank certification and re-use.

As we all know, corporations frequently re-use and reassign storage tank for a variety of petrochemical services. Of course, a tank that is perfectly acceptable for one liquid service may pose a very danger when used in another.

Supposedly, the acceptability of the method of storage is evaluated during the HAZOP evaluation that is required by law.

Anyone who has spent time on the Chemical Safety Board website knows that the process chemical industry does not update HAZOP studies and has a woeful record of fires and explosions because of this.

This screwed up federally mandated system of HAZOPs is better than nothing, but sometimes assumes everyone in the room is an expert on everything. Corporations love to fire anyone with more than five years of experience

A better method, IMHO, would be for the AIChE to get off thier dead asses and develop a new system of tankage design regulations for commonly stored chemicals. The new standards could group chemicals and require certain safe tank designs for that group. Safety, corrosion resistance and economy can be considered.

Will the industry do this....???

Can the indusrty make progress and actually develop clear and useful standards that everyone can benefit from ???

NNNNaaaaaaa.... !!!

We will just hire more MBAs and newbies.....

Rather than having the MBA assign the poor newbie to take design responsibilities that are beyond hs range of experience, a set of AIChE reference standards for tanks would go a long way toward progress and safety for all


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close