×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

stiffener vs. "connection plate"

stiffener vs. "connection plate"

stiffener vs. "connection plate"

(OP)
There are designers who believe that a connection plate (which looks just like a transverse web stiffener except that a diaphragm or crossframe attaches to it, and thus has positive connection to both flanges whereas a stiffener might not) doesn't count as a stiffener, and thus is not to be taken into account when calculating required stiffener spacing and panel width and adding intermediate stiffeners.

I can't find this written anywhere, but I've heard it stated multiple times.

Does anyone know where this comes from?

Hg

Eng-Tips policies:  FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: stiffener vs. "connection plate"

AASHTO LRFD 6.10.11.1.1 permits a stiffener to also serve as a connection plate.

RE: stiffener vs. "connection plate"

(OP)
Anyone know where the perception to the contrary comes from?  That will help in battling the misperception.

Hg

Eng-Tips policies:  FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: stiffener vs. "connection plate"

I haven't experienced the perception that a connection plate can't be a stiffener.  Could it be that someone has the fact that stiffeners shouldn't be used at connection plates (unless they are connected to the flanges) backwards?

I have seen recent designs where bearing stiffeners are used as connection plates for the end diaphragms but are not positively connected to the bottom flange.  Instead they are just milled to bear.  Not a good seismic detail.   

RE: stiffener vs. "connection plate"

(OP)
Dunno, but I've heard it in multiple quarters, and so have others--just recently I heard from a fabricator that a DOT was not letting them use the connection plates to define panel widths for web out-of-flatness.

And I've seen some *really* tight stiffener spacing, connection plates alternating with "real" stiffeners, that strongly suggests that someone wasn't counting the connection plates.

Hg

Eng-Tips policies:  FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: stiffener vs. "connection plate"

I've not heard that either and have for years used the plates for dual purposes.  

Perhaps there were details long ago for a specific DOT that defined each plates role as a stiffener or connection plate that made them mutually exclusive.   

Regards,
Qshake
pipe
Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources