Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
(OP)
How come in competitive sports and arts, there is very little BS at the top levels? Almost all the pros have incredible technique that evolved from generations of pros prior to them. If any professional had a weakness, other pros would exploit that to their advantage.
But this is not the case with professional engineering. I've seen far too many incompetent and unqualified people performing complex engineering analysis. My biggest pet peeve is those with no knowledge of matrix structural analysis doing FEA. Whatever happened to garbage in equals garbage out?
I've often had arguments with engineers who do not understand that in linear analysis the stresses will double if you double the loads. Or I have seen even those with PhD's reporting results to ridiculous number of significant digits. A good example is fatigue life predictions, which are notoriously known to only be correct within an order of magnitude. But time and time again I see engineers report predicted lives of 10,954.36 hours.
Or take another example where again someone with a PhD was showing how 0.5 MPA from one software was 50% off compared to 1.0 MPA from another software. He didn't understand the bigger picture that both these numbers are basically ZERO and cannot be compared with any degree of reliability.
So why does the professional engineering world tolerate so much nonsense and incompetence from so-called "professionals"? But in sports, arts, and music people will smell your BS a mile away. When is the last time you saw a hacker win the Wimbledon tennis tournament.
Or if you play any musical instrument, you'll know the pros know their stuff inside out from tens of thousands of hours of practice. And it's not just any random practice, it is precise techniques and theories that all musicians agree upon. It seems us group of engineers have no common understanding of how the physics and math all works together. We just use the software like black boxes.
But this is not the case with professional engineering. I've seen far too many incompetent and unqualified people performing complex engineering analysis. My biggest pet peeve is those with no knowledge of matrix structural analysis doing FEA. Whatever happened to garbage in equals garbage out?
I've often had arguments with engineers who do not understand that in linear analysis the stresses will double if you double the loads. Or I have seen even those with PhD's reporting results to ridiculous number of significant digits. A good example is fatigue life predictions, which are notoriously known to only be correct within an order of magnitude. But time and time again I see engineers report predicted lives of 10,954.36 hours.
Or take another example where again someone with a PhD was showing how 0.5 MPA from one software was 50% off compared to 1.0 MPA from another software. He didn't understand the bigger picture that both these numbers are basically ZERO and cannot be compared with any degree of reliability.
So why does the professional engineering world tolerate so much nonsense and incompetence from so-called "professionals"? But in sports, arts, and music people will smell your BS a mile away. When is the last time you saw a hacker win the Wimbledon tennis tournament.
Or if you play any musical instrument, you'll know the pros know their stuff inside out from tens of thousands of hours of practice. And it's not just any random practice, it is precise techniques and theories that all musicians agree upon. It seems us group of engineers have no common understanding of how the physics and math all works together. We just use the software like black boxes.





RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
I know you may think this only a small error, but most people with think FEA is only a small analysis tool as well, unless you're an engineer.
All I can say is take pride in your abilities and try and educate those around you, and don't worry all professions have a lot of BS (in your words) going on. I find it soothing for the soul to help people understand that FEA isn't a magical calculator.
An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
In the 70's and 80's...
John Hackenroe...
Regards,
SNORGY.
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
This is not always the case imo.
By far the most competent engineers I have met have been those at the top so to speak.
The "errors" you describe are not competency errors but rather those individuals need a reality check.
After all, is it not those at the top that are developing new innovative technologies for everyone to use?
I am not saying those at the top are all really "good", I am simply saying that RESPECT is what they are lacking....
Fe
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
I think that "Hackenroe" finally won because he started finding more time to practice after being Borged out of his mind for so many years.
Regards,
SNORGY.
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Chris
SolidWorks 09 SP5.0
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Providers of engineering software have their agendas set by customers. Customers always want the software to be easier to use and more productive. As a CAE tool matures, its users need to know less and less about how it works and then even the underlying physics upon which it is based.
I doubt that (m)any FEA users could write their own FEA solver these days. This isn't quite the case in the CFD world yet, but it's getting there.
- Steve
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
What is CFD? I am assuming you don't mean contract for difference, maybe Computational fluid dynamics or completely...
An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
- Steve
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Tuning a PID controller isn't rocket science. There are reams and reams on the topic. If your simulation software contains PID elements, customers always ask how to tune them. Pointing to the literature isn't good enough. So we decide to help them by creating a canned experiment to identify the system and recommend gains. By doing this, we've removed the need for them to understand what they are actually doing. When things go wrong, they do not know where to look and blame the simulation.
- Steve
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Fe
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Comparing with music is a fool's game. There are musicians and vocalists who are amazing technicians who are as boring as hell to listen to, and there are complete hackers with no instrumental training who are brilliantly creative and who communicate something about the human condition in every note. And a precious few who have BOTH. And each likes their own.
Our profession has them too: brilliant theoreticians and skilled number-crunchers, and brilliant intuitive people who can feel their way through problems, can pare through complexity to the few key issues like a hot knife through butter etc. And a precious few who have both.
Licensure requirements vary by location. Here the license means nothing EXCEPT that it gives the public, via the licensure body, a means to ensure that the truly incompetent people, at least those who put people's lives at risk AND who are caught, can be censured. This is distinct from the actions of the civil courts, who prevent nothing but offer compensation to the victims after the harm has been done.
Yes, it's frustrating to see the level of incompetence out there. It's also very frustrating when people state opinion as fact (that's a sin I commit regularly!), or when people under-state the uncertainty in what they're doing. It's also VERY understandable, since "certainty sells" in our business. Try to treat these instances you've mentioned as "teachable moments" rather than letting them boil your blood.
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
They also made a point of looking at the final number, and asking yourself if it makes sense. Does it seem that your answer is an order of magnitude higher or lower than you would expect? If so, then carefully review your calculations and assumptions.
A good engineer will think about what he is doing, and where he expects to go with his results, and not just blindly accept whatever number gets spit out at the end.
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
- Steve
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
The relevance of this statement to engineering is nil, and its veracity with regard to the arts is doubtful.
The visual and performing arts world is full of BS to us common folk.
(I'm not excusing the lack of basic knowledge in the engineering profession.)
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Universities see the industry is using FEA, so universities are teaching engineering students how to use FEA programs. Not teaching them how to understand the results. Not teaching the fundamentals of manual analysis. Not teaching the theory underlying FEA. Just teaching "make your pretty model in CAD, click the mesh button, click the solve button, look at the pretty pictures!"
Too many engineering graduates that don't even understand F=MA or V=IR or even "righty tighty, lefty loosey".
Look at the many many questions here on Eng-Tips that are asked due to a lack of understanding fundamentals.
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
I don't entirely agree. Though I agree that some(too many) graduates are severely under par, this is far exasperated if spoken in a general sense.
"Look at the many many questions here on Eng-Tips that are asked due to a lack of understanding fundamentals. "
Most of these can be attributed to someone with no eng. background asking the question.
Anyone that can click the left mouse button and a few keys on the keyboard can ask a question.
This is imo.
Fe
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
To paraphrase a prof of mine, there is a different expectation of engineers than of, say, politicians and bankers - two other highly trained professions. Those professions bask in wealth and fame but nobody is really all that fazed or surprised when they utterly fail and ruin peoples' lives. The expectation of an engineer is the opposite - we're expected to get it right, the first time, everytime. When an old structure or machine fails (often due to neglected maintenance), people want the heads of the engineers involved.
That being said, if a node jockey is truly a hazard to an organization or end user, then its up to the organization to run him out on a poll or reap the rewards of its own incompetence.
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Sure of that, think Bush II or maybe Palin before you answer.
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Fe
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
- Steve
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Don't forget the bozos on Wall St; how many MBAs and Econ PhDs does it take to make the mess we're in? What's the engineering equivalent of that? And don't say Deepwater Horizon, I think the management professionals are going to get their fair share of the credit for that one as well.
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
'politicians'- 'highly instructed professions'
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
It seems to be engineering graduates that have taken an FEA course were trained as though they were to go on and program FEA code. These courses concentrate on the finer points of FEA code and take a spartan approach by overwhelming students with equations (some of which, granted, they should have but have not learned in classical analysis courses). Then, in a parallel course on engineering design, they try to teach themselves to use the software or have some introductory software style training.
What's missing is the intermediary step- the skill set specific to the users of FEA. What is the appropriate element for the job? What are the potential pitfalls with modeling errors? How do you setup joints for analysis? What about boundary conditions?
These missing practical skills are often found in the manuals of large OEMs but not in university programs.
And that has been a problem with undergraduate engineering education since the 1960s. The focus is on creating grades and the cop-out used by professors (many with no industry experience) is to rely on "gotcha" style academics where analysis is regurgitated to answer an easy to mark question on an exam for the purpose of creating a well defined grade.
With little or no link between the "potato" analysis and the real world, engineering graduates are unable to a) recall the analysis they regurgitated for the exam and b)apply said knowledge to practical problems.
Separately, you also see an older group of analysts out there who have coasted for 10 years or more that take up FEA as an easy path to justify their existence with make believe capability based on a one week training course. These people are of course the most dangerous of all because they may be minor players in management or at least seen as peers of middle managers who grew up along side these individuals. They are often able to convince individuals of very rudimentary skill (their peers) to sign off on their analysis as gospel. Of course, to an engineering manager, the analysis doesn't have to be correct, it just has to be signed and released in the quoted number of hours.
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Of course the amateur level of FEA analyst that don't correlate their models don't really concern us here since we are professionals.
Aren't we?
Cheers
Greg Locock
New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
They are also found in the industrial placements that are part of "sandwich" degrees.
- Steve
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
I just saw a few episodes of America's Got talent on Hulu.com.
Really talented musician singers were rejected for unique "air" guitarists and music acts that were funny/tragic and the big overcame handicapp stories.
They had a quota for every group. If you didn't make the cutoff, nobody hears from you again.
Meritocracy can work, nothing works 100% of the time.
RE: Why so much BS in professional engineering? (Rant!)
Thise that you are aware of in the entertainment and sports industries are the most succesful 1 or 2 % of their industry, you dont hear of the incompetent ones (well not until idol e.t.c.)
The equivalent in the engineering profession are those that win the construction and engineering society awards, if none of your coworkers have won these awards then they should not be compared.