×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

STAAD TANK ANALYSIS - STIFFNESS

STAAD TANK ANALYSIS - STIFFNESS

STAAD TANK ANALYSIS - STIFFNESS

(OP)
I'm analyzing a large, multi-cell concrete tank in STAAD.  I've "cut" the tank into a quadrant to make the model small enough to analyze.  I feel I need to place "fixed-but" supports at the wall edges that would have been connected to adjacent walls.  I think I need to provide a spring stiffnes for all degrees of freedom to make the model think it is still connected to other elements.  Has anyone ever calcualted this spring stiffness before?  I've used this eqation:  K = (Ec/48)*(tw/h)^3 which I took for a uniform cantilever wall from ACI 350.3.  I'm not getting correct results in my model.  Any thoughts?

Thanks,

Jason

RE: STAAD TANK ANALYSIS - STIFFNESS

There is a Bentley: STAAD Products forum that may be a better spot for this.  It's not that I think this an inappropriate topic for this forum.  But, rather that I feel you might get a better response from the folks who monitor that forum.   

RE: STAAD TANK ANALYSIS - STIFFNESS

I would think if you're trying to simulate the adjoining tank wall as a boundary condition, it's a bit more complicated than just the cantilever equation you speak of.  A cylindrical tank will have hoop stresses for example that wouldn't be accounted for using that stiffness equation.

You could try a smaller model of similar proportions and develop an empirical stiffness that you could apply to the larger model.  You may have to do some iterations but I think this approach sounds reasonable.

 

RE: STAAD TANK ANALYSIS - STIFFNESS

I think a symmetrical support boundary condition would be best for this type of application.  I've asked Bentley about it, and no dice.  Does RISA have that type of boundary condition?  

I know high end FEM programs (ansys and such) use a symmetrical boundary condition.  


Below are responses the responses I got from Bentley

Dear User,
 
Further to the response below, one of my senior colleagues had the following suggestion:
 
Actually, if the Y-Z plane is the plane of symmetry, the symmetrical supports are
FIXED BUT FY FZ MX
 
An anti-symmetrical model with anti-symmetrical loads can be defined as well. Then Symmetrical plus anti-symmetrical becomes the response of the structure in the plus X half of the complete structure; and Symmetrical minus anti-symmetrical becomes the response of the structure in the minus X half of the complete structure.


And from a previous email.

Dear User,
 
In case, the structure is symmetric (and the loadings are symmetrical as well), you can indeed model only half of the structure with the line of symmetry being adequately supported (supports being FIXED BUT and free in the Y direction and restrained in the other directions).  
 
However, these methods are appropriate if the algorithms are old and slow. But STAAD has the advantage of possessing the advanced analysis engine and hence, from the analysis point of view, it would not be a problem to model the full structure.
 
From the modeling point of view as well, if you model half of the symmetrical structure, you can easily model the other half using the "Mirror" facility within a very short interval.
 
I hope this helps.
 

RE: STAAD TANK ANALYSIS - STIFFNESS

just model the whole concrete tank..

how would you change the support condition for different load combination..

RE: STAAD TANK ANALYSIS - STIFFNESS

One significant point, is that you can only use symmetry to reduce the size of your structure if BOTH your loading and your structure are symmetric. So that's something to think about.  

That being said replacing half the structure with a symmetric Boundary condition is very easy in just about any program (RISA or STAAD) as long as the symmetry is about one of the global axes. If the symmetry is about an inclined axis then it would get a bit more complicated.  But, that's just because you have to define an "inclined support".  

 

RE: STAAD TANK ANALYSIS - STIFFNESS

(OP)
Hey - thanks to all for your help.  When I tried to model the whole struture my machine kept crashing so I opted to "break" it into symmetrical parts.  I've added "fixed-but" supports to the symmetrical break lines as the Bently response suggested and it seems to work.  However, it seems that my "weird" result were more due to the the elastic mat foudation supports that I'm using.  I'm getting very large shear stesses in my conc. walls at the junction of four walls at the top when all tanks are full of liquid.  when I model the structure on a fixed base at all the nodes I get great results, but they can't be completely true.  I need to evaluate further - and if the high shears are true then I can remedy with a "brace beam" at the top of the wall.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources