No promotions in place
No promotions in place
(OP)
I'm not sure if this is a new policy or it has always been like this, but I've learned that my company has a policy where one cannot get promoted in place. That is, in order to be promoted, a job position has to be opened and I would have to interview for it along with everybody else. This even includes the next step up from my current position.
It seems to me I have no incentive to stay around too long. For now, I'm content with where I am but that's beside the point. I've already seen 1 person jump ship because of this policy and he was an asset to the company.
Is this a common policy? What do you all think about such a policy?
It seems to me I have no incentive to stay around too long. For now, I'm content with where I am but that's beside the point. I've already seen 1 person jump ship because of this policy and he was an asset to the company.
Is this a common policy? What do you all think about such a policy?





RE: No promotions in place
There may be various reasons for your company's policy, probably mostly short-sighted; a simple explanation would be overly in-control control-freak(s).
TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: No promotions in place
If you are good enough, most of us are, just look for a place you feel comfortable with. It may take a few job changes, and may come with a price but could be worth it. It is much easier to find our ways around obstacles than trying to remove all the obstacles we may run into.
Rafiq Bulsara
http://www.srengineersct.com
RE: No promotions in place
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: No promotions in place
I did the job of three people. After 11 years I asked for a promotion. I had one promotion a few years earlier.
I was told that the next position up would be my manager's position.
There had used to be a position between me and him, but it was eliminated.
They really wanted me in the company, but not willing to make me happy.
This was at the beginning of today's recession.
The way I see it, if you have an employee that the company likes and wants to keep, they should do what they can to keep him/her.
I'm fortunate to have had two good jobs since, laid off from one of them.
Chris
SolidWorks 09 SP5.0
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion
RE: No promotions in place
If they want you to fill that position you will still get the job, but if there is a better candidate available then it will be offered to them. Surely every company should be looking to get the best person available in ever position?
If you took the argument that you should only promote from within to extremes there would be no one new ever join the company other than at entry level positions and the tea boy would become the MD if no one else wanted the job.
Surely bringing in new people with new ideas, contacts and experience is what makes companies grow stronger?
RE: No promotions in place
- Steve
RE: No promotions in place
Also why work for a company who does not know the worth of their own employees?
Rafiq Bulsara
http://www.srengineersct.com
RE: No promotions in place
If they combine such a policy with no clear career path of progression, you are doomed to hang around forever or find a better job. If the only job you can get is your boss's job, and he's not much older than you...it could be a long wait. Move on.
RE: No promotions in place
> A suitable position with more responsibilities and pay for the promotee
> Someone to do the work that the promotee no longer does
Both of these require some level of management oversight and review to determine the business case and financing. This is required to get to the step of determining that a promotion is possible.
However, this is wholly separate from whether the promotee is required to be interviewed. While looking for the best possible candidate is desireable, promotion within is equally desireable. No company could readily survive a complete swapping out of people every time a promotion occurs, the training and downtime would be enormous.
Promotion from within allows for relatively seamless transitions, i.e., the promotee could still carry on his original work, while transitioning to his new responsibilities.
TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: No promotions in place
If you are in, let's say, a consulting engineering company, then this is surprising to me because I have never heard of this. Apparently some others are familiar with it though.
Regardless, my initial take is the management would love it. They have no tough decisions to make in this matter. They no longer have to feel guilty consoling a disappointed employee who wants a promotion because it's not his or her fault. It's that other guy who wouldn't hire you for another position. I would think that this would discourage some employees quicker and get them to leave on their own. As long as an employee isn't totally incompetent in the current position, no one has to get fired or pay unemployment.
To answer your question, I don't believe that this is a common policy. I personally don't like it, but don't jump ship too quickly. For a young go-getter, this could be an excellent way to progress quickly. I'd try it out for a few years and see if it works for you. I'd say that you'll know by your second attempted promotion.
Good Luck.
RE: No promotions in place
Now, promotion is based strictly on merit. If you have a patent with the company, your almost garunteed a promotion. Raises work differently. And just like with everywhere else, politics plays a huge role.
However, I dont completely disagree with posting jobs internally. It creates competition, and only those who really want to suceed and move up will continuously apply for upper-level positions within the company.
"Scientists dream about doing great things. Engineers do them." -James Michener
RE: No promotions in place
As with everything in life there were unintended consequences. To apply for the position you had to submit a resume. It seemed that once employees got their resume polished, they started sending it to other firms. We lost some talented people as a result.
RE: No promotions in place
Possibly but...in the interest of fairness to all, this can bea good way of doing things. My former company would simply appoint from within, often without anyone but the appointed candidate knowing that a promotion/vacancy actually existed (jobs for the boys and that sort of thing...). This created a lot of ill feeling, towards both management and the appointee because of all the secrecy that must have preceded the appointment. I argued strongly that whilst management 'might' have had a candidate in mind for a position, it was only fair to throw it open to all employees to apply - that way, they would get an opportunity for interview practice and an (hopefully) honest explanation/appraisal of why they didn't get the position so that they could improve themselves for future opportunities. This also gives notice to management of those people who are actively seeking to better their position (and might consider leaving)
RE: No promotions in place
I can be promoted one more time before reaching supervisor. But I will still do the same job. Even two levels below me the job responsibilites are the same. I don't really care what they call me as long as my pay goes up. My supervisors have the same job as me with the added responsibility of keeping track of my vaction and some open issues. Although I do like that they act as a filter between me and upper management.
RE: No promotions in place
Problem was that last year we let the shipping manager go and shipping was merged into logistics. There's a need for a shipping manager which is obvious to one and all except those who make decisions and spend the money. But losing this one guy will be a terrible mistake. It has been pointed out but not taken into "real" consideration.
drawn to design, designed to draw
RE: No promotions in place
The rule is for any kind of promotion, whether it's a completely different job or one where the job is essentially the same but just more responsibility and pay.
The company is not a consulting company and we do not "re-bid" for new jobs or projects.
RE: No promotions in place
floattuber, what do they do if you compete for the next level of your job and don't get it? Are you then out of a job completely? Or do they now have two people where they used to have one?
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: No promotions in place
RE: No promotions in place
- Steve
RE: No promotions in place
To promote from the entry level, you had to pass a civil service exam (8-hour written + oral interview panel) and you were put on a list based on your overall score. They would start at the top of the list, and for every "opening", civil service rules required them to interview anyone (who applied for the position) within the top 3 scores. As each candidate promoted (same position, but considerably higher salary), the process would repeat for the next position, on down the line. For many/most positions, only the incumbent applied from within the utility.
In theory, the process allowed candidates in other city departments (i.e. Building Dept, Streetlights, Airports) to try for a higher paying utility position. In practice, no-one ever failed to secure an in-place promotion. Their weren't many dead weight situations, as you had to be pretty competent to pass the exam in the first place.
For subsequent promotions (Associate Engineer to Engineer level) you had to apply for a vacant position.
RE: No promotions in place
drawn to design, designed to draw
RE: No promotions in place
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: No promotions in place
I never saw a situation where an outside candidate displaced the incumbent.
I suppose it could happen; presumably he would have to apply for the next position available, or get promoted in a vacant position (some departments were harder to keep staffed, and always seemed to have openings).
I suppose there are provisions in the civil service rules that would allow the incumbent to refuse a promotion and stay put, too.
RE: No promotions in place
It was certainly a shock to me. After thanking the boss, I flatly asked about the "promote in place" policy and he said yeah all the managers are hounding the HR people about it and they are either giving up on the policy or are making quiet exceptions.
RE: No promotions in place
Some new policy is so damn important, but it takes up a needless amount of my time. Since I only work so many hours in a day it often times get forgotten about. Since it was soo important all of my managers forget about it too after the first few months. (sarcasm is case you couldnt tell)
I just love how new policies which are "mandatory" just get dropped or not followed if they had no real purpose in the first place other then to valid a manager's pet project of the week.