O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
(OP)
Hi,
I am designing a static seal with an o-ring.
The particularity is that the groove is non-circular. It has an oval-like shape (see picture in link below).
I am wondering how to calculate groove dimensions.
The medium is compressed air of 10 bar.
Pressure is on the inside, so the o-ring is pressed to the outermost groove wall.
I was thinking to calculate the groove the standard way as if the o-ring was placed in a circular groove, using some online calculator or the Parker Handbook.
Then, I would calculate my oval groove so that the outside wall ('outside circumference') of the oval groove has the same length as the outside wall of the circular groove.
Groove width and depth according to the standard calculations.
Would this be an acceptable calculation method?
Kind regards
Ray
I am designing a static seal with an o-ring.
The particularity is that the groove is non-circular. It has an oval-like shape (see picture in link below).
I am wondering how to calculate groove dimensions.
The medium is compressed air of 10 bar.
Pressure is on the inside, so the o-ring is pressed to the outermost groove wall.
I was thinking to calculate the groove the standard way as if the o-ring was placed in a circular groove, using some online calculator or the Parker Handbook.
Then, I would calculate my oval groove so that the outside wall ('outside circumference') of the oval groove has the same length as the outside wall of the circular groove.
Groove width and depth according to the standard calculations.
Would this be an acceptable calculation method?
Kind regards
Ray





RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Ted
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Dan
www.eltronresearch.com
Dan's Blog
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Petrotrim Services
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Its a static application (flanged faced) so simple square / rectangular groove design.
I would design the groove and oring so that it hugs the inside circumfrence of the groove with a small % stretch compression. This is purely paractical for assembly disassemble and retention etc..
Height of the groove approx 2/3rds of the O ring O.D.
Width of the groove will be a function of the area left required to give the appropriate compression percentage & area for the oring to deform into.
Work in terms of oring compression percentage most manufacturers data can range from 18 - 22 % oring compression (personally i have used 25% for ultrahigh vaccumm systems using viton orings)
Hope this can help
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
I use very similar for our static HV and UHV Viton/Kalrez O-ring grooves;
1/3 compression.
Cross-sectional area of groove 5%< or = cross-sectional area of O-ring, to ensure the O-ring completely fills the groove.
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
O-ring dimensional tolerances are rather large relative to typical groove tolerances.
Most o-rings arrive toward the low side of the tolerance range, because manufacturers still buy material by weight.
Once in a while, you'll get an o-ring that comes in near the large end of the tolerance range for dimensions, and hence volume. Put that in a groove designed for nominal size o-rings, and you can't close the joint, or you'll fracture something while trying.
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
And I forgot to mention that, where possible, the grooves inner perimeter is sized such that the O-ring is slightly stretched when inserted.
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Ted
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
"Height of the groove approx 2/3rds of the O ring O.D."
--- I assume you mean 2/3 of the o-ring cross section diameter?
@CorBlimeyLimey (whatever happened to simple usernames like Joe or José ..?
"Cross-sectional area of groove 5%< or = cross-sectional area of O-ring"
--- So you mean a negative groove fill ? (groove section smaller than o-ring section?)
@hydtools,
"it works if the outside of the groove is smaller than the OD of the o-ring requiring a squeeze to install the o-ring. Leave excess gland volume "
--- I was planning to do just that. What I haven't told you is that this particular application requires that the seal is often 'opened'.
The groove is in the 'ceiling' of the application, so I want that the o-ring is compressed into the groove to prevent it from falling out when the seal is opened.
The inside circumference needs to be sufficiently small to provide space for the o-ring to be squeezed. In other words, the groove needs to be sufficiently wide for the o-ring to expand.
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
As a developer of high pressure systems for up to 20000 psi (~700 atm), for aerospace systems, for the last 30 years, I can assure you that your logic it correct. Since the pressure comes from the inside it tends to stretch the o-ring until it will touch the outer side of the oval. This stretch will degrade, crack or tear the o-ring with time. Therefore, Eltron's suggestion to use the center line is wrong and sc0rd0bes's suggestion to hug the inside is even worst (the maximum air pressure difference in vacuum systems is only 14.7 psi (~1 atm) which is quite small compared to your case. However, sc0rd0bes's is right in case of vacuum systems where the outer pressure is larger than the inner pressure. Regarding to assembly, if you make the outer length of the oval a little bit smaller than the outer length of the o-ring it will not fall when you push it into the grove. Regarding fill percentage, it should always be smaller than 100% to allow the o-sing to deflect sideways as a result of the squeeze. O-rings designed to seal only on three surfaces/sides. In your case: the flange, the bottom of the groove and the outer side of the groove. The inner side of the groove should not touch the squeezed o-ring to allow a free passage of the gas to apply pressure on the inner side of the o-ring thereby, to press it simultaneously to the flange, the bottom of the groove and the outer side of the oval.
Regarding the squeeze, for small pressure as in your case, there is no need to go to more than 10-15%. 25% and above are intended for really high pressure systems. However, in such high squeeze rates the o-ring needs to be replaced if it was disassembled, because such high squeeze may create too much permanent set of the o-ring thickness. See o-ring manufacturer data regarding the minimum squeeze, compressions set, etc, with respect to pressure, o-ring type of material and hardness.
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
"Height of the groove approx 2/3rds of the O ring O.D."
--- I assume you mean 2/3 of the o-ring cross section diameter?
yes, Cross section diameter to use the correct nomenclature in this case.
Israelkk - great points thanks for correcting the obvious difference.
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Your working pressure (10 bar) is relatively low so the amount of o-ring compression (ie. groove depth) is not critical. With low pressures, I prefer to reduce the amount of o-ring compression so that it requires less clamping force and also so that the o-ring elastomer is less likely to take a compression set.
With an oval shaped face seal like yours, I would also size the o-ring so that it fits snugly around the inner wall of the groove. This makes things easier during assembly because the o-ring won't fall out of the groove when turned upside down. If the o-ring sags out of the groove during assembly, it is easy to pinch or cut the o-ring when the cover is clamped tight.
Hope that helps.
Terry
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
The compression % is definitely something I need to give some attention to. Especially because the seal is often opened and closed. If compression is too high, there might be some compression set which is not good if you need to open and close all the time.
Kind regards
Ray
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Ted
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
I milled a groove in a little test part where the o-ring was compressed against the outer circumference. It seemed to stay fairly well in place. Tapering the groove wall will ofcourse help a lot. But it will also increase production cost. The actual setup will have 80 of these o-ring seals.
@hydtools,
Yes, adding some grease will help. But in this particular application, the seals will undergo temperature cycles from -50°C to +150°C (-58°F to +302°F). So probably the grease will quickly dry out. Perhaps a few drops of cyanoacrylate glue ('superglue') might also help.
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
However there are certain surface quality is required for the o-ring grooves. In your case, I guess, there are some machining problems for the oval shape to meet the surface quality required. Are you sure that you can obtain the required surface quality with the oval shape? What kind of tool do you consider to manufacture this shape? Discuss it with your manufacturer to make sure you are on the right way.
Ibrahim Demir
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
That is a good remark.
According to o-ring suppliers specifications, surface roughness for grooves should range from 0.8 to 1.6 um Ra (micrometer Ra).
That can be achieved with milling.
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
---...---...
Related problem, different job.
I've got a oil-to-water heat exchanger here in Spain ( no 1/4 inch O-rings available) on a crit path job with no assembly drawings for the heat exchanger or maintenance spec's. Low pressure (40 - 60 psi) on both sides.
Only available O-ring kit has 6.0 mm tubing. (We believe the grove is designed for 6.5 mm (1/4 inch nominal) O-ring (3/16 deep x 9/32 wide).
O-ring groove measures at 4.5 mm deep by 7.5 mm wide.
Compression of a 6 mm O-ring = 6/4.5 = 33% (Good, based on comments above)
Area of 6 ring = 28.26 mm2
Area of 6.5 ring = 33.16 mm2
Area of 7 ring = 38.46 mm2
Area of groove = 33.75
It appears a 7 mm o-ring is too large.
Do I approve the 6 mm O-ring?
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
As long as your o-ring elastomer compound is of average hardness (60 or 70 durometer) then 1.5mm compression of a 6.0mm nominal section o-ring cord is more than adequate for sealing a deltaP of 60 psi. Most manufacturers recommend a maximum compression value of 35% for most situations. A static face seal type o-ring seals against the groove at the top and bottom points of contact. If you calculate the amount of friction force holding the o-ring in place, created by compressing the o-ring over its linear length, you'll be surprised at how much pressure differential it would actually take to push the o-ring out against one side of the groove.
Also, you mention that your o-ring is sealing an interface between oil and water. Take care to ensure that the elastomer you use is compatible with both fluids.
Good luck.
Terry
The 6.0mm o-ring x-section area is about 84% of your groove x-section area. This is a little bit more than optimum for a low pressure seal, but still should be OK.
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
About 45 minutes from now. 8<)
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Here is the Parker o-ring handbook for future reference:
ht
Ted
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Thank you.
RE: O-ring groove design for non-circular groove
Ted