×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Trouble With Bronze Elongation % Values below minimium.
3

Trouble With Bronze Elongation % Values below minimium.

Trouble With Bronze Elongation % Values below minimium.

(OP)
One of Vendors, makes Bronze Impellers from 20 to 300 kgs is having issues acheving the full elongation values for a nominial (88/10/2) Bronze Compostion. That requires a 13% minimium elongation value to comply with AS1565/Grade C92610A.
From what I can discern the chemical compostion complies with the specification. We had some earlier troble with excessive Phosporous levels and have dropped it down to 0.010 % which is about as low as we are prepared to go with out taking risks with gassy metal - this did help, but not enough. What do I look at next???
 [Currently, I'm looking at filtering the testbars, But are we missing the Obvious?]
I'm attaching some 'vetted-out' test reports so you get the idea.     

RE: Trouble With Bronze Elongation % Values below minimium.

I would investigate the microstructure, specifically, grain size and porosity.  Elongation (fracture strain) of any type of casting, not just bronzes, is significantly affected by both of these.

RE: Trouble With Bronze Elongation % Values below minimium.

(OP)
Thanks TVP. - good advice, I'll see if we can get a micro done and see what that turns up - Has anybody got any more further thoughts?

RE: Trouble With Bronze Elongation % Values below minimium.

2
If my memory cells are in alignment after many years, 50+, we used to add an deoxidation step to this alloy along with several others.
I'm trying to recall what the deoxidizer was, Lithium  keeps popping up as one of the deox materials. It was encapsulated in a Cu tube and my job was to charge the tube to the bottom of the electric rocking furnace after they withdrew the electrodes.

Anecdotal:
About ten minutes after I had added the deox. one of the seals on the horizontal electrode blew out and high pressure hydraulic fluid went straight into the furnace. The resultant explosion took out two additional furnaces and one of the 10 or so workers burned, one died from the burns.   

RE: Trouble With Bronze Elongation % Values below minimium.

(OP)
Thanks, Unclesyd this is helpful as well, and I had been given some thought to the same idea about the possibility of using a partial substitution of lithium as a deoxidizer but hadn't heard of any one doing with this type of alloy.

I'm familiar with using this, along with Calcium boride as a deoxidation in high conductivity copper.

Has anyone used this, or other meaningful deoxidizers or grain refiners.
[see TVP Comments]other than 'phosphorus or lithium' for   88/10/2 alloy? Or  suggest best deoxidizer  practice?

P.S. A very good reminder about safety hazards with dealing with molten metal, for all of us in the foundry industry can take it a bit too lightly
I recall a giant explosion with a 3 ton electric arc furnace when a 'wet' back charge was put in.  It burnt the roof timbers, partially disabled the crane and heard about 1/2 mile away - lucky nobody got hurt!
I think they say, the ratio is about 200 near misses to 1 fatality...
...So safety is a really big issue!



   
 

RE: Trouble With Bronze Elongation % Values below minimium.

Great post, unclesyd. I appreciate your experience.

RE: Trouble With Bronze Elongation % Values below minimium.

Here is paper on the production of some of the copper alloys that includes a table of the relative effectiveness of several deoxidizers.
My recall doesn't have the high conductivity it use to but I believe we used Lithium as it was very fast allowing for a quick grab sample of the heat.

http://www.tdr.cesca.es/TESIS_UPC/AVAILABLE/TDX-0104105-092144//03Vggf03de11.pdf

RE: Trouble With Bronze Elongation % Values below minimium.

(OP)
Question: What about the pouring-temperature of the teat bar?
The casting is thin sectioned and poured at 1200°C or 2190°F along with the test-bar at the same time.
Is 1150°C or 2100°F for the testbar more appropriate
I recall reading A obsolete Foundry article. that the grain structure changes in form and size with decreasing pouring temperature for 85-5-5-5 at least.

Does anybody stipulate a 'pouring temperature range' for testbars with this material 88/10/2 ??
  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources