×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Back to Back Channels

Back to Back Channels

Back to Back Channels

(OP)
Is there a standard procedure for analyzing a beam made of back to back channels with a non-continuous spacer plate between? I'm working backwards, I know the I-beam size for what I need, but want complete out of channels so I can place a tension rod between the channels.  I have looked at the shear flow, but since the plates are not continuous I am unsure if I can do this.  Also, would I have to look at the bolts for tension capacity? Any help would be appreciated.

RE: Back to Back Channels

Two channels back to back form a doubly symmetric member similar to an I-beam.  The properties Sx and Ix are simply the sum of the properties of the individual channels.  Spacers must be close enough to prevent localized buckling of individual channels.

Shear flow is not an issue because of symmetry.

BA

RE: Back to Back Channels

BA - in terms of shear flow for weak axis bending (or lateral torsional buckling for strong axis bending) you do have some shear flow.

Two unconnected channels back to back have very different buckling characteristics (for strong axis bending) than when they are connected together.

Granted, the shear required to avoid LTB is small, but it does exist.

 

RE: Back to Back Channels

JAE,

My earlier comments apply to double channels connected together.  It was my understanding that the OP intends to connect them with non-continuous spacer plates.

I agree that shear flow exists, just as it does in an I-beam, but shear flow in the flanges of one channel counteracts shear flow in the flanges of the other so that the shear center and the centroid of the combined shape are in the same place.

I hadn't thought about lateral torsional buckling, but if the unbraced length is substantial, that would be a consideration.

BA

RE: Back to Back Channels

The top flanges are going to want to separate and the bottom flanges are going to want to come together.  I would make the spacer plates as deep as possible and vertically separate the 2 rows of bolts likewise.

RE: Back to Back Channels

Zivil,

Perhaps, instead of 1 1/2" spacer plates, you could use 1 1/2 x 1 1/2 HSS spacers.

BA

RE: Back to Back Channels

If the channels share the vertical load, is LTB governing the load capacity of the system?

RE: Back to Back Channels

(OP)
Thank you all for the input, I appreciate it.  I am having difficulty figuring the tension capacity needed to size the bolts.  Any ideas?

RE: Back to Back Channels

the bolts are in shear, not tension.

RE: Back to Back Channels

(OP)
I believe the bolts are in both when the spacer between the channels is non-continuous.  Is this incorrect?  As Weab mentions above, "The top flanges are going to want to separate and the bottom flanges are going to want to come together.  I would make the spacer plates as deep as possible and vertically separate the 2 rows of bolts likewise."  

RE: Back to Back Channels

Without bolts, each channel would act as a separate beam, loaded eccentrically.  The eccentricity, e is the horizontal distance from the point of application of load to the shear center of the channel.

If you provide bolts each side of the tension rod, then:

T = P*e/d

where T is the tension in the upper bolts each side of the tension rod (T/2 each).
P is the applied load in the tension rod.
e is the eccentricity
d is the vertical distance between bolts (perhaps a bit conservative)

In calculating e, the point of application of gravity load may be taken as the center of channel web.

Tension in the bolts is expected to be very small.

 

BA

RE: Back to Back Channels

In the above, P is the load per channel, so it is only half the load in the tension rod.

BA

RE: Back to Back Channels

(OP)
Thank you all, I appreciate your help.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources