Member Login

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Materials in equipment ASME VIII Div. 1 without U-STAMP

Materials in equipment ASME VIII Div. 1 without U-STAMP


I'm asking if is possible to use an alloy with european certification EN in an ASME without U-STAMP equipment.

The specific case is that our pressure vessel is less then 2" of diameter and our customer ask us to design and test according to ASME VIII Div. 1. (It doesn't require U-STAMP).

In this equipment we will use for a part of it Alloy 6082 T6 (for a flange from a round bar).

ASME SB-221 doesn't consider this alloy (only 6061 and 6063).
Unfortunately 6061 is impossible to find in Europe and all round bar here are in 6082 T6.



RE: Materials in equipment ASME VIII Div. 1 without U-STAMP


Since you are not U stamping the vessel, it doesn't have to meet all of the Section VIII requirements. Thus, it becomes a matter of agreement between you and your customer. Go to your customer and explain the situation. An anonymous internet forum is no replacement for customer-shop communication.


RE: Materials in equipment ASME VIII Div. 1 without U-STAMP


Even if it would have to be U stamped, you would have had the option of recertification, according to UG - 10 (if I remember correctly), that stipulates a material can be replaced with another one (according to other standards than ASME), provided that has, at least, same mechanical properties. Thus, I see no problem here.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close