×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

K-factor Selection

K-factor Selection

K-factor Selection

(OP)
First, some background info...

Our client's standards state that vertical fixed ladder supports shall not exceed ten feet. Upon inspection of already-installed ladders on this particular site (designed by other firms), we noticed that many of the actual support spans exceed ten feet (approx. 12'-20' spans). I have been asked by the client to analyze the ladders to see what our maximum allowable spacing really is.

Now, the part I'm confused with is the selection of a reasonable K-factor for the weak axis slenderness. I know that the base is fixed and the top is pinned per my FBD on sheet 2 of the attached pdf, giving me a K value of 0.8. That makes perfect sense to me for the strong axis, but along the y-axis (same axis as rungs) I'm not sure what to use. In my attached calcs I used 0.8 for K for both directions, but I think this may be over-conservative as the rungs are essentially acting as braces in the y direction. What are your thoughts?

RE: K-factor Selection

(OP)
Another few things to add...

The rungs are spaced at 12" O.C. and are welded to the side rails. I also included two channel sizes for the side rails (C3x4.1 and C3x5) in my calcs because those are the two shapes that are installed in the field.  

RE: K-factor Selection

I would use K = 1 and L = 1'-0" for buckling about weak axis. But, I seriously doubt if that controls the strength.

RE: K-factor Selection

(OP)
@strucguy:

That was my first inclination. Doing that would result in the strong axis governing the max support span.

RE: K-factor Selection

Check out AISC 13th edition - spec section Appendix 6.  

I would agree that you would have one check be k=1.0 and L = 12" for the individual channel, but overall, the whole latter could bend between ladder connections to the supporting wall or whatever.  

This makes the two channels work together so you might have a 20 foot value for L and a k = 1.0 with two channels working together.  This would probably control.  

You could assume that all the rungs created a sort of Vierendeel truss and created a stronger condition - to verify that I guess I'd do a second order analysis on the ladder.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources