×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

OSHA Requirement for Proof Testing of Lifting Lugs

OSHA Requirement for Proof Testing of Lifting Lugs

OSHA Requirement for Proof Testing of Lifting Lugs

(OP)
I have a question/comment regarding the applicability of OSHA proof testing requirements to welded head lugs and tailing lugs.

Here in the USA, OSHA 1926.251 applies to vessel lifting lugs and requires a proof test to 125% of the rated load of the lug.
http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10686
http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=27299 (interpretation)

It is my understanding that without a doubt, a removable flange lug which may be used for multiple vessels requires a proof test per OSHA requirements.

However, I have seen hundreds of vessels with welded top head lugs and in all cases have not had proof testing of the lugs. I believe the argument is that they are classified as being mass produced (as this would preclude them from proof testing). Furthermore, even though they have slight differences for each application, they are still the same type of lug with a similar geometry.

I was interested to know the opinion of anyone else with experience on the matter.

Thank you.

RE: OSHA Requirement for Proof Testing of Lifting Lugs


Bump...I am anxiously awaiting someone smarter than me to respond.  

RE: OSHA Requirement for Proof Testing of Lifting Lugs

AWDMIKE,

Lifting or tailing lugs welded directly to the vessel are "integral" parts of the vessel. They are not part of rigging equipment and its accessories. Hence, lugs welded to the vessel are not in the scope of OSHA 1926.251.

RE: OSHA Requirement for Proof Testing of Lifting Lugs

I agree with the above.  You have one set of rules for lifting devices, but that does not imply that the load itself has to be tested in some way.

RE: OSHA Requirement for Proof Testing of Lifting Lugs

To all,

In my opinion, this whole arguement pivots on the OSHA definition of "rigging equipment" and "accessories"

As I read the standards and the interpretations "rigging equipment" and "accessories" must be removable from the body of the load. (although this is not clearly stated)

Welded, permanent lifting and tailing lugs, trunions, etc would not fall under these definiitions.

A BOLTED lifting flange on a manway or nozzle would fall under these definitions....even though it was meant for a single lift.

I do not believe that it is practical to test a welded lifting lug at 125% of its design load without doing some kind of local damage to its intended load.

I suggest the liberal use of descriptive adjectives.....such as bolted and integral or welded.

-My opinion only

-MJC

   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources