×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Terzaghi Lateral Load due to Surcharge

Terzaghi Lateral Load due to Surcharge

Terzaghi Lateral Load due to Surcharge

(OP)
In the 1954 Terzaghi formula for lateral loads due to a point load surcharge, there is a reference to a variable "H".  In a sheet pile design, would H be the length of the sheet or simply the excavation depth?  From the figures I've seen, the excavation depth seems to be the right answer, however this would imply that the surcharge is negligible/zero below the excavation depth.  Any idea which is right?

Thanks.

RE: Terzaghi Lateral Load due to Surcharge

The point load does not automatically dissapear at the bottom of the excavation. It depends on magnitude of the load and proximity to the sheetpile wall.

Try "Foundations and Earth Retaining Structures" book by Budhu for clarification.  These formulas are tedious in that one equation would only gve you the lateral earth pressure at one point, say 10 ft below top of excavation.

Lately I have been using SoilStructure's Lateral Stress Software.   

RE: Terzaghi Lateral Load due to Surcharge

Based on my experience the surcharge load is usually cut off at the bottom of the excavation due to the fact that the passive resistance of the soil below grade is an order of magnitude greater than the active load.

RE: Terzaghi Lateral Load due to Surcharge

Here's the general equation for Poisson's Ratio of 0.5:

delta qh= (3Q/pi)*(r^2*Z/R^5)  where,

Q= point load
R= line of sight distance to the wall point of interest (using pythagorean theorem with r and Z)
r= horizontal distance to the wall point of interest
Z= depth to the wall point of interest

I've explained the variables as such because you may want to look at wall stresses in other planes (i.e., not just perpendicular to the wall where the point load is applied).

Please note that this equation assumes a non-yielding wall.  Please note also that the Bousinessq equation would give you half the value of the equation that I've typed.  I've removed the "2" from the denominator because when you are up against the wall, the "free field" stress conditon does not exist.  Field measurements by Spangler (1930's) show that the actual wall stresses are about 1.5 to 2 times the calculated values from free field analysis.

Hope this helps.

f-d

¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources