×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS
5

MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
Been working abroad for quite some time now and I was kinda surprised when my friend told me that he attended a seminar in our country and the speaker told them that the required reinforcing area for the positive moment of a reinforced concrete beam is 50% of what is required for the negative moment at the same cross section. Our country's code is almost an adaptation of ACI for concrete structures. But I'm not well aware of such from the ACI code, if there is, can anyone please guide me and show me the section  of the code stating what I have mentioned. Thanks.

Just for additional info, the subject matter is for singly reinforced concrete beams.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

I'm guessing you mean negative moment of the same beam.  I guess in a frame situation you could have negative and positive moment at the same section, but that's really the only condition I can think of.

Can you clarify?

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

This doesnt seem to make sense.....

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
Sorry been a li'l confused let's disregard the positive moment, my mistake. What they are saying is that in a section of a beam the required reinforcement for a singly reinforced beam on its compression side must be 50% of what is required for tension.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
Sorry Sir Toad. Just a li'l mixed up please ignore anything that doesn't make sense or you can at least ask me to clarify things thanks.

How come there is no option to edit posts here...(out of topic)

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

singly reinforced beams don't have compression steel...hence the name "singly".  

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
^ Yeah you're right but in actual construction you still put rebars at the compression side. Please correct me if I'm wrong  please so in my understanding on what my friend told me is that the rebars required for opposite side (I'm not calling it compression anymore to satisfy your point) directly below the tension side is 50% of what is required for tension. I'm looking for a provision in the ACI that states such 'coz as far as I can remember I haven't encounter anything like that.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

I don't know why there would even be a requirement for a minimum of steel on the compression face of a beam experiencing negative moment if you're not accounting for it in design.  

The only thing I can come up with is an attempt to ensure ductility at supports to allow for greater moment redistribution.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
^We only used to consider them as stirrup holders that's why I was a li'l bit curious by such statement...so what I'm asking is that is there a provision in the ACI that states what I have mentioned above if none, maybe the seminar speaker have his own resources or maybe they have updated our country's code to which I'm not aware of. Thanks a lot sir.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

I was thinking that the only compression steel would be that which is placed so that stirrups can be hooked around steel on the compression side

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
^Yes sir you are 100% right that is what we used to do during actual construction of singly reinforced beam, we use compression steel as stirrup holders. That is the reason why I want to verify the idea that was relayed to me. Thanks.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

Continuous top bars are put in to support stirrups, these can be nominal.  Top bars can also be added to help control defelction, and reduce creep.

My boss tends to add a similar number of bars that are on the bottom, but with one bar size less.  This of course can be overly conservative.  

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

The speaker was probably referring to Special Moment Frames which require positive moment strength at the joint face to be at least one-half of hte nagative moment strength at the joint face (ACI 318-05 31.3.2.2)

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
^I think that's really conservative as compared to the 50% I mentioned. Thanks.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

wow..fingers got all out of wack on that one - try "...the negative moment strength at the joint face (ACI 318-05 21.3.2.2)

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
Nice one Sir WillisV I'll check that one right away!!!

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

You may want to look into ACI 318 under the provisions for shear reinforcement and see if there is anything in that portion of the code. Also for the development of hooked bars in tension.  

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

I'm not surprisedd at the requirement as for many years, basement walls 10" thick or greater have had the requirement that the soil or compression face have at least half of the rebar required for the tension face.   

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

I use top steel = bottom steel near the supports, then at 1/3 span drop the top steel down to 2 beams to act as stirrup supports.

Going back to the original question, the only thing that I can think of that applies is that a fixed-fixed beam has negative moment = WL^2/12 and positive moment = WL^2/24.  Therefore, positive moment is 1/2 of negative moment.  But this is only applicable in "true" fixed-fixed conditions.  I'll usually design top and bottom steel for WL^2/12 for continuous beams.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

"2 beams" should be "2 bars", of course.  We really need an edit feature...

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
Thanks Sir msquared48 .... another lesson learned.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
Thanks Sir steellion.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

Nothing in ACI would require this in a general case.

In a continuous beam, or a fixed end, moment frame beam, ignoring lateral moments, you can determine strength required for a single reinforced beam (bottom, midspan, using WL^2/8), and place half the bar bottom midspan and half top at the ends to redistribute the moment.

You would do this to control deflection and cracking in certain situations, or to reduce congestion.  But you would not need to put full single reinforcement in bottom, mid-span, AND 1/2 more at the ends.

 

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
^  WL^2/8 Isn't this the formula for the maximum moment of a simply supported beam? Why not just use the actual moment as per analysis whether it be simple, continuous, fixed end, etc. and from there you start your design and adjust your rebar area & curtailments as per code requirements.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
WL^2/8 - I mean the formula for the maximum moment of a simply supported beam with uniform load.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

Depending on thew fixity or release conditions, you may wind up using a lot more reinforcing than necessary. In fact, you coulod end up with an over-reinforced beam for the conditions if you are not careful.

Best to either use the appropriate equations for the actual conditions, or revert to those listed in ACI.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

(OP)
^That's right sir we might end up having a steel area more than 75% of the balanced steel ratio.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

Obviously, you would use appropriate resistance factors when determining the appropriate design.  And as you know, whether or not a beam fails in compression is not a function of the nominal strength, but rather the overall design.  Having a beam which is stronger than required is the whole point of using: phi*Mn>=Mu

My point is that taking a maximum moment (as I point to with the example equation for uniform loading), you could end up designing for redistributed moments, with 1/2 of the steel in top (ends) and 1/2 in bottom (mid span).

As to your original question, there is good reason to use compression steel, but not an IBC or ACI 318 code requirement to do so when designed for simple span, gravity moments.

RE: MINIMUM REBAR AREA FOR COMPRESSION SIDE OF RC BEAMS

TXStructural - I'm not sure it is appropriate to just assume a re-distributed moment as you seem to be describing (from bottom positive to negative top steel).  

ACI is pretty explicit in how you redistribute moments - usually taking 90% of the calculated negative moment and adding it to the positive - but only if you meet particular rules regarding reinforcement ratios.

WillisV provides the correct answer, in my view, to the original post in refering to the seismic portions of ACI to explain perhaps where the source of the 1/2As came from.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources