×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Hammer size for driving sheet piles

Hammer size for driving sheet piles

Hammer size for driving sheet piles

(OP)
Our contractor has a problem driving steel sheet piles, and I would like advice on hammer sizing.  He is driving pairs of PZC-13 sheets(22 psf) 22 feet long into very stiff to hard fat clay below the water table.  He is using a Dawson HPH 1800 hydraulic hammer rated at 7235 to 13750 foot-pounds per blow.  He is running the hammer at minimum energy, getting resistance over 30 blows per inch at 17 feet of penetration, and curling the tops of the sheets.

I suspect that a bigger hammer will get the job done. His supplier says that a bigger hammer will simply curl the sheets quicker.  What size hammer would commonly be used for this section?  A Delmag D-12-30 is available.

RE: Hammer size for driving sheet piles

Does the contractor have the correct driving head to fit the sheet section he is using?  Without the proper driving head, the top of a sheet is not securely contained and can be curled over or torn up.  Because PZC sheets are a relatively new product, the contractor may not have the correct driving head (or no driving head at all).

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Hammer size for driving sheet piles

PEinc has a good point - well worth checking out. How are the piles being driven in pairs, are they tack welded together? Why doesn't he try driving single piles? I am a bit surprised that 22 feet long piles are causing such a problem but I'm not familiar with that section and tend to think that with everything unchanged maybe a bigger hammer would just cause more damage earlier.

RE: Hammer size for driving sheet piles

A PZC 13 sheet is 27.88" wide.  A double is 55.76" = 4.65'.  This is very wide compared to the width of the impact pile hammer.  That means that, without a proper driving head, a lot of energy is being applied to the piling in a small area.  This can damage the sheeting.  Zambo is correct that you may have better luck driving single 27.88" wide sheets rather than driving doubles.  However, you still need the correct driving head.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Hammer size for driving sheet piles

(OP)
Thank you for the suggestions.  The hammer has a driving head narrow enough to drive single piles. That may well be part of the problem.

RE: Hammer size for driving sheet piles

From Nebrasks DOT's specs:
j. Piles shall not be driven without the use of a closely fitting cap or driving head. This cap or driving head shall be of such design as to distribute the blow of the hammer throughout the cross section of the pile.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Hammer size for driving sheet piles


You want the driving head to spread the impact over as much of the sheet (pile) head as possible.  Will overall dimensions of the hammer allow driving singles without interference with adjacent sheets?  

Yosh

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources