×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Geogrid evaluation - Break Elongation

Geogrid evaluation - Break Elongation

Geogrid evaluation - Break Elongation

(OP)
Two biaxial polypropylene geogrids each have about the same ultimate strength but one has a lower break elongation. I'm told that the grid with the lower break elongation is superior because it confines the aggregate quicker and thus stabilizes the reinforced layer quicker. Is this a correct explanation and is it better to have the grid with the lower break elongation?

Looking at the two grids we are comparing the data is:
Type A
Strength at 2% strain 21.0kN
Strength at 5% strain 32.6kN
Ultimate Strength (at break elongation) 33.2kN (5.3% strain)
Type A
Strength at 2% strain 12.0kN
Strength at 5% strain 23.0kN
Ultimate Strength (at break elongation) 31.5kN (10% strain)
  

RE: Geogrid evaluation - Break Elongation

The lower elongation is a positive factor in your application, given essentially the same ultimate tensile strength. This means that its strength is mobilized quicker and with less displacement than if the elongation were longer.  The downside is that if you are close to failure, failure will occur quicker because of the reduced ductility.

Also...don't cross post in multiple forums.  Against the rules.  I red flagged your same post in the "Foundations" forum.

RE: Geogrid evaluation - Break Elongation

(OP)
Thanks Ron. I think I'm missing something. About failure, isn't failure caused if the force exerted on the gird exceeds the ultimate strength? If that's the case, wouldn't both grids break at the same time once that strength was reached?...also, isn't the difference only that the grid will the higher elongation will move more before it breaks.

 

RE: Geogrid evaluation - Break Elongation

They would break at the same stress level, but the displacement of the one with greater elongation could give some failure warning.  With the lower ductility, failure could occur without warning.  In either case, there might not be enough warning to do anything about it.

RE: Geogrid evaluation - Break Elongation

What test method are you using to test tensile strength?  I ask because you are showing units as kN, for geogrid testing the proper test would be a wide-width test that would give you kN/m values (ASTM D6637). 21 kN at 2% strain does not sound right for a biaxial geogrid.

Also, are both geogrids polypropylene (PP)?   

RE: Geogrid evaluation - Break Elongation

(OP)
Tensile strength as per ASTM D 6637, method b (wide width). The units are kN/m and both grids are polypropylene. The strengths indicated are for only the Transverse direction. The Machine direction strengths are similar in that the strength at 2% strain is very high.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources