×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Earthquake design
3

Earthquake design

Earthquake design

(OP)
when designing a structure for earthquake, would the earthquake forces be higher at the top of the structure or at the base? or would the earthquake loads be dependent of the dead loads on the specific floor? thanks

RE: Earthquake design

The story forces are dependent on the story mass and coincident acceleration that is driven by ground acceleration.  However, when ascertaining base shear or the overall overturning moment, we are looking at the total effect of those individual forces.  As such bottom stories see the largest force response while the upper stories see the largest displacement response.  This assumes, of course, that there exist a linear elastic force displacement relationship.

RE: Earthquake design

You can see it yourself when you calculate the forces following the UBC procedure to calculate the seismic forces of a building.  You will see that the forces in the bottom stories will be higher than those in the top stories, and just like Qshake mentioned, the top stories will have larger displacements.

Nigel

RE: Earthquake design

Oops!!!! SORRY, I WROTE UPSIDE DOWN!!!
THE SEISMIC FORCES WILL BE HIGHER IN THE TOP STORIES!!

NIGEL

RE: Earthquake design

Well, the point to make here is that when summing for the base shear, the forces will be larger in the bottom stories.  Additionally, since the top stories are transferring the force to the base each downward story will have to transmit its force plus the one above it, etc.  

When we look at the story shear that is influenced only by two items mass and acceleration.  Atop a building, with smaller members as building design practice dictates, the displacements are larger as are the accelerations owing to the less stiff arrangment.  Less mass more acceleration.  Near the bottom, more mass, less acceleration.  

But because load path is important and the forces are transmitted to the foundation the ultimate seismic forces at the bottom of a structure are larger.

RE: Earthquake design

(OP)
thank you all for your suggestions. they have been very helpful. i was just wondering though, how would a foundation take the horizontal forces? aren't foundations designed in such a manner in where it only takes vertical forces?

RE: Earthquake design

Abosolutely not!  Foundations must be designed to resist vertical, lateral, and any overturning forces.  In short, the foundation must be designed to resist all of the forces acting on the structure.

RE: Earthquake design

Following the Northridge Earthquake in 1994 work at UofC Jacob's school of Engineering has studied post-tensioning to produce weld-free steel frame buildings.  This would significantly reduce surge transference and dampen the potential damage.  Contact Andre Filiatrault for detals at University of California San Diego .  

RE: Earthquake design

In the last month or so I saw an article someplace that discussed the Statistical Analysis resuls of seismic events in a certain area. It was thought the analysis might lead to a way to make a slight guess on the possibilities of future quakes in that area.
Now I cannot find that article. I thought I had saved it, but if so it is so well saved it cannot be uncovered. Has anyone else seen that article and if so where in the world is it??
Thanks
RevanK

RE: Earthquake design

RevanK,
Check out this site for earthquake design. http://www.bssconline.org/
What you may be remembering is that the USGS has published maps of probabilities of lateral accelerations.  FEMA has incorporated this information into their design reccommendations, and it also shows up in the Army Corp site, and the ATC-49-1 report:
http://www.atcouncil.org/
The end result is that bridges with piles in soft silt and clay will be designed differently than bridges on rock, even though they may be in the same seismic zone.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources