×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fluorosilicone greases vs. Silicone greases

Fluorosilicone greases vs. Silicone greases

Fluorosilicone greases vs. Silicone greases

(OP)
One of my main projects at my company is to reduce our inventory of adhesives and other chemicals.  I've been asked to look at our lubricants and try to cut down on what we use.

In particular, I'm comparing Molykote 3452 (fluorosilicone base with ptfe filler) and Parker Super O-Lube (conventional silicone grease). The molykote's viscosity is almost a factor of ten lower than the O-lube, but otherwise the only difference seems to be the base.

In general, it looks like fluorosilicone lubes have all the advantages of silicone lubricants, plus other advantages like:
They will not swell silicone o-rings
Higher load capacity for metal-metal contact
Effective at lower speeds
Better chemical resistance

I'm not finding out what the disadvantages are. Other than cost, is there any reason to prefer a silicone based grease like O-Lube over the fluorosilicone grease?

RE: Fluorosilicone greases vs. Silicone greases

Hi. So many questions come to mind.  For example, are you at one atmosphere, or are you under vacuum?  Is there potential for a boundary-lubrication  condition?  What are the contacting surface metals?  

Generally, a higher viscosity grease should ensure a better, more consistent stream of oil.  Assuming the thickener doesn't get in the way of the lubrication, in which case you would have noise.  Both choices in oil type are comparatively low volatility, so lubricant retention in terms of evaporation should be acceptable.  My only question for DOW (Molykote) is if, under boundary contact, fluorine will react with the surface, iron for example, create a catalyst and promote polymer degradation.

If you need more information on how to choose a low friction coating, I'd be happy to help you at:
<a target="_new" href="http://www.industrialcoatingsworld.com/Low-Friction-Coatings/index.html">Low Friction Coatings</a>

Best wishes.


                  

William Gunnar
http://www.IndustrialCoatingsWorld.com
 

RE: Fluorosilicone greases vs. Silicone greases

(OP)
When you say a higher viscosity of grease, what do you mean? I've been trying to understand the relationship - if any - difference between NLGI consistency, base oil viscosity, and the effect of thickeners.

The current application involves o-ring lubrication, the majority of which are buna-n, some viton, a potential for silicone in the future. Most o-rings are static but a few are used to seal areas that will be rotated back and forth at very low rpm. The o-ring is sandwiched between steel, or steel/aluminum, or aluminim/UHMWPE. Room temperature, 1 atm use, with short term exposure to chemicals and/or high pressure steam for cleaning between uses. Not user-serviceable, but will be recovered and remanufactured a few times, at which point the seals will be replaced and relubed. Money is never not an issue, but these come close.

From the research I've been doing it's looking like there's no reason to not use the fluorosilicone, but I'll be glad to hear any other ideas

RE: Fluorosilicone greases vs. Silicone greases

Hi. First, I have to say your choice of any silicone-based grease is spot on for lubrication between plastic and steel.  NLGI defines "consistency" (ASTM D 217) by the cone penetration test.  Maybe not much help other than to suggest a grade number, determined from your "DN" value (diameter x rpm).  For low speed, yes, choose the higher viscosity oil.  If your thickener is aluminum, based on the need for high chemical resistance, that's a plus.  In summary I'm siding with you, PratsA.  Your choice of the fluoro-silicone product makes perfect sense.   

Thanks for posting.  



   
     

William Gunnar
http://www.IndustrialCoatingsWorld.com
 

RE: Fluorosilicone greases vs. Silicone greases

(OP)
Thanks for the tip on aluminum.  I will keep reviewing my options.  Your advice was very helpful.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources