×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Diaphragm Design Loads

Diaphragm Design Loads

Diaphragm Design Loads

(OP)
Question: the procedures for coming up with a diaphragm load (i.e. in section 12.10.1.1 of ASCE 7-05) are only applicable for the design of the diaphragms themselves correct (and the associated elements like chords, etc.)? I've always thought they just served as a minimum design load.

The reason I ask is: I was making sure that this load was not then to be distributed to shear walls, etc. for design......I've wondered this sometimes because after all the trouble you go to calculate this load, for a flexible diaphragm (with an irregular shape) you'd have to go back and figure the load to the shear walls based on a tributary area method. Thanks in advance.

 

RE: Diaphragm Design Loads

Your interpretation is correct.  The diaphragm loads apply to diaphragms, collectors, chords, and connections to shearwalls etc.  The shearwalls themselves are designed for force distribution via flexible, rigid, or semi-rigid action based on force levels from the Equivalent Lateral Force method (or a dynamic method if you so choose).  Note for a 1 story building the ELF method and the diaphragm loads are the same thing.  

The reason behind the different set of loads is to try to better capture the local demands on a diaphragm if it happens to have a good bit more mass than the others.  The ELF forces capture this in the shearwall design, because the effect of the mass is thrown up higher in the building in a mode 1 type distribution which increased overturning moments etc.  However for the local diaphragm the ELF distribution might underestimate the inertial forces thus the separate checks.  

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources