×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Standard tolerance scheme for lasercut stainless

Standard tolerance scheme for lasercut stainless

Standard tolerance scheme for lasercut stainless

(OP)
Looking at some suppliers I see people claiming plus/minus .003 to .005 on positional dimensions.

The question I have is "for a lasercutting machine, is that over the entire part?  For the first 6 inches?

I'm working with a 16" wide sheetmetal part that mates to some plastic parts, and just need to verify my dimensioning scheme.

Chris Loughnane - Product Design

http://www.pdnotebook.com
http://www.twitter.com/DesignNotebook
 

RE: Standard tolerance scheme for lasercut stainless

In my experience, mostly with stainless steel, the roughness of a lasercut edge makes a .003-ish tolerance seem a little silly.

 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Standard tolerance scheme for lasercut stainless

Firstly, any such claims are in regard to their manufacturing capability, not tolerances.

Tolerances are a design function.  Manufacturing processes have error.

As engineers we should understand the difference and use the terms correctly.

Now, to your question.

When your drawing is converted to a set of instructions for the machine, all the coordinates are converted to an absolute reference scheme based on the machine's known origin point.

The cutting head has no idea what feature it last made, or what feature it is going to make next, and it has no idea of the dimensioning scheme or tolerances on your drawing.

RE: Standard tolerance scheme for lasercut stainless

(OP)
Isn't manufacturing capability expressed in tolerances?

That's kind of like saying I'm talking about height, not inches.

Semantics either way...

Now, to your response.

That makes sense, but still confuses the issue a little bit. If a machine starts at the origin, and goes to one hole, then the next, then the next, etc. It seems that the error would add up between each.

Assuming it creates the features closest to the origin first (I think likely), that would make features further away have a greater possible variation in their position.

The only way I can think of them holding .003 (or .005) throughout is if, after each feature is made, the machine comes back to the origin and recalibrates it's position.

I doubt that the latter of those two methods is true, which gets back to my question... does the variation increase with it's distance, or is it the same over the entire workpiece?

Chris Loughnane - Product Design

http://www.pdnotebook.com
http://www.twitter.com/DesignNotebook
 

RE: Standard tolerance scheme for lasercut stainless

Let's start with, how can they say that they can achieve +/- and then give a range.  Can they achieve the small side of the range, or the large side?  If they're going to give a range then then need to explain the range.

Perhaps they have more than one machine, and different machines have different capabilities.

So for the moment, let's pick a number.  .003

What they think they are saying is that if they command the tool head to a specific position then the tool will go to that position with an accuracy of .003.

With only the information given so far, we don't really know if this accuracy is composite, or applies separately to each axis of motion.

The machine knows the tool position based on feedback from some sort of encoder.  Maybe its error is a function of distance from the origin, maybe it isn't.

In all likelihood the people making the accuracy claims don't understand what they are claiming.

RE: Standard tolerance scheme for lasercut stainless

Basically, most laser cuts are within .005 of the ideal line.  Varies with thickness and material.  Nitrogen blanketing helps.

RE: Standard tolerance scheme for lasercut stainless

Pressuring vendors for specific claims about what they can or cannot do is pointless.

Give them a drawing with tolerances, and buy (or don't buy) a part made to the drawing.

The resulting part passes inspection, or it doesn't.  Binary function, returns one value, 0 or 1, no ambiguity to resolve.



 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Standard tolerance scheme for lasercut stainless

Mike, I don't really think that asking vendors about  tolerances they can hold is pointless.  Actually, it's quite the point.  Many vendors even try to add PO modifying comments to their invoices that state their own tolerances regardless to drawing requirements.  This kind of information is very important before one issues them a PO.

Matt Lorono
Lorono's SolidWorks Resources & SolidWorks Legion

&

RE: Standard tolerance scheme for lasercut stainless

Quote:

Many vendors even try to add PO modifying comments to their invoices that state their own tolerances regardless to drawing requirements

Which brings us back to my earlier point about people needing to understand the difference between tolerance and manufacturing capabilities and process deviation, error and distribution.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources