×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

No correlation between hardness and ultimate tensile strength !
2

No correlation between hardness and ultimate tensile strength !

No correlation between hardness and ultimate tensile strength !

(OP)
I have a metallurgical problem : when I take different parts from a steel  bloc i don't found correlation between hardness (HB) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS)

How can I explain this ?


  

RE: No correlation between hardness and ultimate tensile strength !

Do not expect an absolute relationship. If you plot a least mean squared statistical analysis of the data, you can clearly see the relationship of increasing UTS with increasing hardness.    

RE: No correlation between hardness and ultimate tensile strength !

That looks like a good correlation to me.
Run the statistics, make sure to account for precision of each test, and you have good results.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: No correlation between hardness and ultimate tensile strength !

All the hardness data provided is in a narrow band of 35 -400BHN. It is easy to err ,when testing the samples. Also,since you are close to 400BHN,can you consider using carbide indentor,instead of steel one.

The data as represented fits neatly in a band,do not expect to get a straight line relationship.

RE: No correlation between hardness and ultimate tensile strength !

The formulae for calculating UTS from BHN are based on statistical analysis of empirical evidence produced over half a century ago.  

RE: No correlation between hardness and ultimate tensile strength !

Aye, but it's a good rough guide, in all fairness.

Explaining it is simple, stanislasdz. Hardness testing is a compressive test, tensile testing is a tensile test (surprisingly!). Compressive tests are pretty much (although not totally) unaffected by inherent flaws in the material. Tensile testing is affected.

Take a titanium aluminide as an extreme example. Compressive strength is huge, but the brittleness of the sample due to cracks formed on solidification causes the UTS to be rubbish.

I should point out that this is the TiAl one company I worked for made, the stuff can be very good, apparently.

RE: No correlation between hardness and ultimate tensile strength !

There are a number of factors involved that have nothing to do with the presumed hardness-UTS correlation:

1) You mentioned 'different parts of the block' - metallic materials are rarely perfectly homogeneous in both composition and properties.  
2) Tensle tests inherently have a certain amount of scatter.  
3) Hardness tests have measurement error, especially if indentation size is visually measured.  This increases at smaller indentation size; i.e. higher hardness (where this data is).  

Hardness-UTS correlations (and hardness conversions) should always be taken with a large grain of NaCl.  The many points collected to generate these curves have some scatter, and the curves are 'best-fit'.  

Also, you are looking at data points within fairly small parts of the respective HB and UTS ranges.  The scatter will be visually exagerrated.
 

RE: No correlation between hardness and ultimate tensile strength !

(OP)
Great Answer !
Thanks a lot Brimstoner !

 

RE: No correlation between hardness and ultimate tensile strength !

I guess we forget that most correlations found in applied engineering texts are based on widely scattered test data.

 If this particular data set was plotted on log-log paper and extrapolated back to the origin, it would look like a smooth fit.

In the case of hardness vs UTS, the UTS test data is usually from a sample that is long enought to fit in a test rig, while the hardness test zone is only a surface phenomena . Considering how a material is cooled down following  N+T , the outer surface zone cools much faster than the inner zones, one would expect a different microstructure at the surface vs internal zones. Review a typical TTT plot and correlate that to a temp vs time vs depth thru the cooled part ( nased on a conductive heat transfer model) and see for yourself.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources