×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?
3

Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

(OP)
Hi all,

Is it possible to have a surface voltage potential (surface voltage profile) which exceeds the grid potential (GPR)?

Refer to Figure B.8 of IEEE (image attached). Is this what it is showing us?

Thanks to all.

JP

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

(OP)
IEEE 80:2007

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

(OP)
IEEE 80:2000!

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

2
No, it is not possible (unless you have negative soil resistivity).   

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

(OP)
What is the attached image (see original post) from IEEE80 showing me then?  Is that not showing surface potential greater than GPR.  This occurs for Unequally spaced grid?

This may seem like a silly question but I have done some modelling which shows surface potential greater than GPR.

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

I think it's showing you a plotting error.

Alan
"The engineer's first problem in any design situation is to discover what the problem really is." Unk.

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

(OP)
The image is an extract from IEEE80...

Can anybody explain it?

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

Taken out of context, no.
We don't all enjoy the luxury of access to IEEE documents.
Is this homework?

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

Not much context provided. Graph is from the EPRI program, and the point made is that the maximum touch potential does not occur at the corner so it must be evaluated over the entire grid.

Maybe some round off error in the program? Doesn't really matter since the areas of concern are not at the wire locations, but in between where the difference is greatest.  

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

I doubt that Figure B.8 is directly from the EPRI program.  It was probably created by some graphics program using the EPRI program output.  I suspect the user of the graphics program just didn't get the lines quite right.

Are you sure that your model is showing surface potential?  The IEEE std 80 definition of GPR is "The maximum electrical potential that a substation grounding grid may attain relative to a distant grounding point assumed to be at the potential of remote earth."  If the fault is to an object connected to the ground grid, then the maximum grounding grid potential will higher than any point in the soil at a distance from the grid (even directly above it).  The voltage difference between the grid conductor and any point in the soil is caused by the fault current flowing through the soil resistance.  This will always be a voltage drop, not a voltage rise.  If your modelling shows differently, it is wrong.
 

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

"Using the computer program of EPRI TR-100622 [B63], a square grid with unequally spaced conductors
was modeled as shown in Figure B.7.
The computer output included the grid resistance, a surface voltage profile, the step voltage, and the corner
mesh voltage."

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

(OP)
Thank you all for your replies.  This is a good forum.  I shall enjoy contributing.

Conclusions:
1.  It is theoretically not possible to have a surface potential which exceeds the GPR.  Practically, through modelling inaccuracies, it is.

2.  Figure B.8 in IEEE80 shows an error with the EPRI program.  It was caused by inaccurate current ditribution representation (particularly at the connection nodes) due to a lack of segmentation (division) of the conductors.

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

Hello all,

I concur with the comment associated with fig 8.

However; we should be aware that there are special conditions were induced voltages in metallic return conductors such as shield wires, telephone cables, pipelines, fences, etc. transfering voltages that produce touch potentials larger than the GPR.

For additional details in this subject check the IEEE Std 80.
  

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

Quote:

However; we should be aware that there are special conditions were induced voltages in metallic return conductors such as shield wires, telephone cables, pipelines, fences, etc. transfering voltages that produce touch potentials larger than the GPR.
The problem was that the earth surface potential was shown greater than GPR, not touch potential.  

I'm curious how the touch potential could exceed GPR.  This would require that you were touching (or standing on) something that was at lower potential than remote earth while touching something connected to the ground grid, which is at GPR potential with relation to remote earth.
 

RE: Ground Potential Rise > Surface Voltage Potential - possible?

Enclosed are three pages with the following information:
   Page 1: Excerpt from the IEEE Std 80 describing cases for touch potential exceeding GPR.

   Page 2: Alternate calc for Example of IEEE Std 80- for Figure B.7 confirming that Vtouch < GPR.

   Page 3: Fig B.7 edited with remarks.


I hope this could help clarifying this post.



 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources