×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Too many shear walls

Too many shear walls

Too many shear walls

(OP)
In a concrete residence mid-rise building, all the partitions between the units are concrete walls that continue from foundations to the top. The building is narrow and long, and the wall are in the short direction, which makes it very stiff in this direction. Questions:
1.    By providing minimum rebars in some of these walls and not developing the rebars at the base for tension, are we eliminating them from the lateral resisting system, and
2.    Is it OK to have the natural frequency in the short direction 3 time greater than the long direction as long as the storey drifts are within the allowablelimits?
Thanks for the input.
 

RE: Too many shear walls

1.  A rigid wall which is unconnected at the base will not be able to resist any lateral force other than dead load, but it will affect the relative deflections between levels.

Personally, I would connect all walls equally.

2.  I don't know of any reason why the natural frequency should be a concern.

BA

RE: Too many shear walls

(OP)
Thanks BAretired,
We did connect all the walls, but, There are no columns here, only walls, therefore, the foundation system is now totally designed to resist loads due to earthquake, which made it very expensive, especially becasue the building is located in a high seismic area. And regarding the NF, you mean it is OK for the building to be much more flexible in one direction than the other?

RE: Too many shear walls

1.  Just because the walls are pinned at the foundation doesn't eliminate the lateral loads the shearwalls attract on the way down.  What will happen is that all of the lateral loads in the other shearwalls will have to redistribute through the diaphragms to the rigid shearwalls within the last two or three stories.  The code penalizes this type of lateral redistribution.
2.  The natural frequency should not be too much of a concern for a rigid shearwall type building.  If you have a flexible moment frame in the other direction you might consider a modal analysis.  This might be a good idea for the high seismic area anyhow.

RE: Too many shear walls

the two reasons i can think of to replace concrete walls with stud partitions would be 1) cost and 2) reducing the effective seismic weight.

i did a condo or two for a developer who required full-length concrete walls between all units and marketed that fact to buyers.

but seriously, don't make us talk you out of too many shearwalls 8). usually as SE's were fighting for more.

RE: Too many shear walls

How tall is the building, once you get to higher heights having having different stiffness in different direction will affect the wind load. Generally this happens if the building is sensitive to frequency for wind loading.  

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while you realize that they like it

RE: Too many shear walls

If your walls weigh enough to provide sufficient resisting moment, you theoretically do not need any dowels into the footings for overturning.

But you still have to justify transferring the shear into the footing, and for that you should have developed (or partially developed) dowels.

DaveAtkins

RE: Too many shear walls

(OP)
Again, the problem with too many shear wall is that the foundations, including the piles and the pile caps and the tie beams are all designed for higher than gravity loads. This is a 10-storey building and all shear walls have overturning moment that requires developing the bars to resist tension.

RE: Too many shear walls

Without the intermediate walls, you would have much thicker slabs.  Same problem with mass.  Agree with vandede, when you have adequate shear walls, don't try to give them back.

RE: Too many shear walls

The more shear walls, the less the stress in the walls and the smaller the vertical boundary elements, drag forces and greater the redundancy.  

Redundancy is particularly important now with all the major earthquakes we are seeing, and will continue to see for some time to come.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Too many shear walls

For question #1 ,
you can eliminate whatever you do not need from lateral load resisting system ,just load will go to the stiff elements

For questions#2 ,
check  building acceleration under wind for human comfortable factor(Serviceability limit),i think this one is critical.

Check interstory drift under sseismisc load ,and overall drift under wind,the guys who are doing the external building envelope ,facade or whatever should be happy about drift under wind load.


For development length , you can reduce them if the bars not highly stressed, ACI 318 clause 12.2.5

last thing ,what is the stiffness of slab compared to walls for lateral stability?,in some type of buildings as the one you describe ,slab and shear walls form like a frame so you will find the slab is part of lateral force resisting system ,just want to make sure you considered this point.



 

RE: Too many shear walls

teguci's response was the best

"1.  Just because the walls are pinned at the foundation doesn't eliminate the lateral loads the shearwalls attract on the way down.  What will happen is that all of the lateral loads in the other shearwalls will have to redistribute through the diaphragms to the rigid shearwalls within the last two or three stories.  The code penalizes this type of lateral redistribution."

he's dead on with this point. the walls will attract load from top to bottom, don't know they don't have dowels into the foundation, then have no where to go with it and be forced to redistribute. you don't want this.

RE: Too many shear walls

Star? (Smile)

RE: Too many shear walls

Like Teguci said, it will likely be a vertical and horizontal irregularity per ASCE 7-05 Tables 12.3-1 12.3-2.  It probably qualifies for the Soft Story irregularity, the Weak Story irregularity, and the Out-of-Plane Offset irregularity.  

If it's allowed by all of the referenced sections in the table, then your forces will increase greatly and you may have to do a modal response spectrum analysis taking into account the actual story stiffnesses.  It may not even be allowed based on your seismic design category.   

RE: Too many shear walls

Maybe you can come up with a system which isolates the walls from the floors, thereby making certain that the shear does not make its way into the "non shear" walls. You will need some special details but I believe the code lets you do this.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources