×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Mismatch - Pipe Flange to Pump fLANGE

Mismatch - Pipe Flange to Pump fLANGE

Mismatch - Pipe Flange to Pump fLANGE

(OP)
I am working with a client and there are pipe-to-pump size mismatches.
Pipe suct = 2"-150"  connectd to Pump suct = 1.5"-150#
Pump disch=1.5"-150"  connectd to Pipe Disc = 1"-150#
Apparently the flange bolts are a size smaller to make everything align.
From the Client's view, it works, it does not leak and it has been that way for 10+ years.
The pump operating pressure is about 60% of flange rating.

What arguments can I present to the Client for facility modification ??

 

RE: Mismatch - Pipe Flange to Pump fLANGE

If the service is Category D (non-hazardous) and the design pressure of the system is, as you said,  less than 150# class, the owner can choose to do nothing.  Obviously you would not replace the existing system "in kind" because it's just plain bad practice, but there'd be little justification for ripping it out and replacing it just because it looks bad.

If the service is "normal fluid service", meaning something at least somewhat hazardous if released, a person would have to demonstrate that the new "designed flange" combination (i.e. the combination of mis-matched components) was safe despite the thinner studs. 10+ years of service won't be any comfort if and when the joint fails and people get hurt.  

Obviously the available gasket seating stress isn't a problem since the joint doesn't leak.  The fact that the useable raised face area is actually SMALLER in this configuration than it would be for flanges of the same size doesn't hurt either.  If you use a gasket requiring far less than the maximum seating stress that ANSI flanges are designed for(i.e. an o-ring or the like), and you use a smaller gasket area, and a design pressure of only 60-ish percent of the 150# rating, you can get by with fewer or smaller bolts and thinner flanges when you do the ASME VIII Appendix 2 calculation.  Do an Appendix 2 calc using the new geometry and stud sizes and design pressure and see what you get.  That might help you decide what to do.    

RE: Mismatch - Pipe Flange to Pump fLANGE

After 10 years - why bother?

RE: Mismatch - Pipe Flange to Pump fLANGE

Any possibility that these are reducing flanges?  

RE: Mismatch - Pipe Flange to Pump fLANGE

The client is losing a lot of money (pump impeller wear too!) with that sudden and sharp break in flow sizes at both suction and discharge.

Energy costs alone make the change in pipe sizes - suction and discharge side - cost-effective.

Best pump performance is smooth pipe straight inlet for 14-20 x pipe diameters, upward-facing reducer (if needed) and smooth discharge.

RE: Mismatch - Pipe Flange to Pump fLANGE

(OP)
For the record, I am going to answer my own question.
The facility should be modified because the assembly pressure rating can not be evaluated by established pipe codes

RE: Mismatch - Pipe Flange to Pump fLANGE

Why not?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources