×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Expanding foam insulation

Expanding foam insulation

Expanding foam insulation

(OP)
We're having a thermal chamber extension built in-house and have found a problem with the expanding foam that was recommended to us.  

The thermal analysis that was done suggests polyurethane foam (0.014 Btu/hr-ft-F) or cork board (0.025 Btu/hr-ft-F)for the insulation.  The expanding foam that was suggested to us is rated at 0.12 Btu/hr-ft-F.  The analysis and the foam suggestion were made by different people.  As you can see, there is a magnitude of difference, however I can't imagine foam differing by that much.  

Another problem is the manufacturer's english and metric rating.  The english rating is 0.12 Btu/hr-ft-F while the metric rating is 0.017 W/mK.  The conversion I've found says 1w/mK = 0.5779 Btu/Ft-hr-F.  The english and metric versions don't match.  The manufacturer says to divide the english value by 7 to convert it to metric.  I don't know where they got this.

So my questions are:
1) which is the correct (ballpark) rating for polyurethane foam?  0.014 or 0.12 Btu/hr-ft-F?  
2) am I missing something about the conversion?

I've gone online and looked for typical ratings for foam, but much of it is in metric and I can't do the conversion unless I know the answer to #2.  I'm unsure of which is correct.

Here's the data sheet for the expanding foam with the english and metric values.
http://fomofoam.com/NEWPDFS/E84-TDS.pdf

RE: Expanding foam insulation

Note also that the units in the Wiki table have length squared.

The length unit in thermal conductivity is a bastard unit because it is properly:

heat per time per unit thickness per unit area per unit temperature difference.

The length squared term in the area and the length term in the thickness result in a length unit to the first power - if the units are consistent.

Area in square feet and thickness in inches screws you up by 12.

Area in square meters and thickness in cm screws you up by 100.

Etc.

You very often see thermal conductivity messed up.
 

RE: Expanding foam insulation

In another product sheet from the same company the K- factor is listed as 0.162 BTU·inch / ft²·h·°F (0.023 W/m·K)
Which is not consistant english to metric but does give you all the factors to check your product against.

Regards
StoneCold

RE: Expanding foam insulation

I have tried to interpret your supplier data sheet another way, but still doesn't work:

1.    K factor (PER INCH) for English unit

0.12 Btu/[(ft *h *°F)*inch] = 0.12/0.083  Btu/[(ft* h* °F)*ft] = 1.446 Btu/[(ft^2 *h *°F)]

2.    K factor (PER INCH) for SI

0.17 W/[(m*K)*inch] = 0.17/0.0254 W/(m^2*K) = 6.693 W/(m^2*K)


Unfortunately the conversion factor  from Btu/[(ft^2 *h *°F)] to W/(m^2*K) is 5.674466 and so

1.446 Btu/[(ft^2 *h *°F)] = 5.674466 * 1.446 W/(m^2*K) = 8.162 W/(m^2*K)
 

RE: Expanding foam insulation

(OP)
Thanks for the help guys.  I finally got a hold of the thermal analysis guy here and he agrees there's something strange going on with the data sheet numbers.   

RE: Expanding foam insulation

Probably I got it: I mean I think I have found the reason why your supplier told you to divide by approx  7 (multiply by 0.143)

K factor (PER INCH) for English unit

0.12 Btu/[(ft ^2*h *°F)]*inch

Now to convert this to SI units:

Consider:
1.    Btu/h = 0.294 W
2.    ft = 0.3048 m
3.    °F = 0.5555 (deltaT)
4.    inch = 0.0254 m

0.12* [0.294/(0.3048 * 0.3048 * 0.5555) * 0.0254]  W/(mK) = 0.12 * 0.1447 = 0.01736 W/(mK)
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources