×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?
5

Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

(OP)
I have been confronted with a principal question abouw flow velocity in a pipe. This question is not about the economical flow velocity in a pipe, that one can find in some textbooks, but about whether there is a limit flow velocity, if being exceeded, will ultimately lead to the degeneration of the pipe material. Cavitation due to a pressure lower than the local saturation pressure is a known factor, but should not be considered here.
It would be interesting to hear your comments on this.

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

I think the limitation would be more in the line of having a pressure so great as to blow up the pipe.

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

Yes.  Practically speaking, I refuse to split hairs any longer, with a fixed inlet pressure the theoretical maximum is near the velocity of sound in the fluid.  More pressure drop will not increase mass flow.

Here's a basic discussion,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choked_flow

**********************
"The problem isn't working out the equation,
its finding the answer to the real question." BigInch
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

its called the errosional velocity.

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

Excellent answer dcasto, well... except for the extra "r" smile.  I totally went down the wrong track on that one.  I should have paid attention to the OP, rather than get sidetracked by the first response.

**********************
"The problem isn't working out the equation,
its finding the answer to the real question." BigInch
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

API RP 14E provides some guidance on erosional velocity considerations for two phase gas/liquid piping on offshore platforms. It presents an empirical relationship
Ve=c/√(pm)
Ve is erosional velocity
c= empirical constant (=100 continuous duty, =125 intermittent, and for no solids in the fluid stream)
pm = gas/liquid mixture density lbs/ft3

Higher values of "c" can be used if corrosion is not a factor.

Cheers,
John
 

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

I think that talking about "erosional velocity" is meaningful only for some fluid. Just to clarify, IMO speaking of erosional velocity for water (pure, drinkable water without particles or fines suspended) is kind of a nonsense.

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

unless the fluid contains meaningfull amounts of sediment or other particles, rational design and operation of most facilities will rarely if ever produce flow velocities in pipes that creates significant amounts of erosion during the design lifetime. That said, I have seen very damaging erosion in gravity flow drains that are not even flowing full and at relatively low velocities but are carrying a significant bed load of sand and gravel.

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

You sand coming out of a gas well will cut through anything.

**********************
"The problem isn't working out the equation,
its finding the answer to the real question." BigInch
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

If you rule out "erosional wear rate" (which I do not), then there is the issue of having to go rob a bank to buy enough pump to push the fluid through the pipe.

rmw

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

water jet cutting:
Uses a high velocity stream of abrasive particles suspended in a stream of Ultra High Pressure Water (30,000 - 90,000 psi) which is produced by a water jet intensifier pump.

I would like to see any ordinary pipeline exposed to these pressures. This is a specialty and is far beyond the limits of the typical design. And according to wikipedia, it is done with abrasive particles.
 

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

The rate of erosion wear is proportional to the velocity of the fluid, to the flow rate, and to both
size and shape of abrasive particles in the flowing medium. So the "quality" of the fluid plays a very big role here.
A cutting process with water jets could be made even with pure water, but jet impacts the surface to be cut orthogonally, that is in a way a bit different from what a fluid does when flowing in a pipe.
 

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

2
This is normally addressed at the outlet of pumps. For carbon steel piping, the max velocity ( considering flow unbalances at elbows and expansions) is 20 fps, with a typical design max average of 15 fps. For 1% chrome alloy pipe that 20 fps may be raised to 30 fps. For incolnel and stainless steel ( in zero chlorine environment) maybe 70 fps is the max for liquids.Capillary tubes may use SS or incolnel at high velocities to frictionally choke the fluid in high pressure drop applications .

 Also, in the case of pump discharges, one must provide at least 7 diameters straight run prior to an elbow or to an expanded transition to larger diameter carbon steel piping.  

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

Yobbo,

If you are interested in further info concerning erosion related issue, you can take a glance at the attached paper.

I also insist that for pure water (no fines or abrasive particles in) erosion velocity is meaningless. Cavitation phenomena, induced in areas where the liquid pressure drops below the vapor pressure, are by far more worrying.

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

From a practical matter, I have seen heat exchanger tubes that have been eroded through-wall due to high velocity water running through them.  No expensive pump needed ... purer water than most of us drink ... took about 3 years.  Water velocity, if I remember correctly, was in the 17 to 20 foot per second range (5 to 6 m/sec).

Granted, they were thin-wall "tubes" versus a pipe.

Patricia Lougheed

******

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

ione-

pure water ( demineralized holy water) will erode feedwater heater tubes quickly immediately downstream  of the tube inlet ( tube + tubesheet design ) for the case of AVT all volatile feedwater treatment with hydrazine type oxygen inhibitors, if the average water velocity exceeds about 10 fps ( vena contracta velocity above about 15 fps)and you are using CS tubes.

2 reasons for this- first, the fluid streamlines at the entrance cause a pronounced vena contracta increase in peak velocity ( which is also reflected in a high recirculation eddy velocity in the boundary layer at the  wall) , second, the type of oxide layer formed is magnetite, which is weakly attached and will spall off easily. A better solution is to use the combined oxygenated feedwater treatment system to 250 ppb O2, and this causes the oxide scale to be a tough hematite.  

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

Davefitz,

Star for you.

Anyway are these phenomena imputable to erosion for sure? What I mean is: with heater tubes (high temperature – lower vapour pressure) and with high fluid velocity, I think cavitation plays a role and so I am not sure we can speak of simple erosion.


By the way is really hydrazine still used as oxygen scavenger? In Italy it has been banned due to carcinogen issues.
 

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

18Mohm deionized water, which is ostensibly "pure" actually tends to get acidic over a short period of time, due to the absorption of CO2 from the air, resulting in carbonic acid.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

Does reducing the velocity help, and if it did, would that be due to a lesser volume of water flowing past, or actually due to the lower velocity?

**********************
"The problem isn't working out the equation,
its finding the answer to the real question." BigInch
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

For a strictly kinetic erosion, net mass flow would seem to be the key.  Ion milling and sputtering are gas phase versions of that.

For cavitation, it's mostly velocity, since that's what causes the cavitation bubbles whose collapse and subsequent shockwave supposedly results in erosion.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

It is not unusual to take cavitation induced damages for erosion related issues. In effect the results can be the same, but I am/was more prone to speak about erosion, if abrasive media are dispersed into the fluid.  

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

OK.  So you were speaking about the effects of two mechanisms together.  Erosion by water contact-impact, without help from sand, and material loss from cavitation.

**********************
"The problem isn't working out the equation,
its finding the answer to the real question." BigInch
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

BigInch,

Yeah. I have some difficulties (my fault) to accept the concept of erosion when dealing with a fluid which doesn't have abrasive particles or fines in.

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

We must remember that molecules, atoms, electrons, photons, quarks, etc. can be "particles", at least when some of them are not acting like waves.

**********************
"The problem isn't working out the equation,
its finding the answer to the real question." BigInch
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

While perhaps most popularly perceived or assumed, "erosional" flow velocity is actually not the only "physical" consideration [you may wish to read the information/links etc. in e.g. many past threads accessible with "Advanced Search" such as http://eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=252110 , http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=167516&page=9,  http://eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=241013 ,   http://eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=212461, http://eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=256160 and probably some others.]

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

Just a word of caution on the use of API RP 14E guidelines.  They are just that, guidelines.  A lot of folks take them as the gospel truth and that is a capital mistake.  Use them as a starting point and go from there.  Actual field experience is the best gauge of the upper limit erosional design velocity.

Like BigInch, I too have seen pipe cut through very quickly.  It doesn't take much.  We used to use 2" sch 80 CS elbows at the first 90 downstream of the wellhead on gas well connections.  Those lasted about two months.  This was gas service at 60 ft/sec, 200 deg F, and "some" sand.  We switched the elbow to a tee and voila - no more cut-out problems.

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

is the tee thicker or stronger (or harder) than the elbow?  

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

No - Same material.  The tee redirects the velocity of the stream away from the wall and into the open space end of the tee.  The part of the stream that was moving along the elbow ID is now busted up due to the empty space presented by the open tee.

The downside of this scheme is the tee creates a very short dead leg on the other end of the tee because the other end is plugged or capped.  If you can't tolerate any dead legs, e.g. corrosion cells forming inside the tee, then this idea doesn't work.

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

Erosional effects of air in water are addressed by ASHRAE HOF. Erosion effects of air would depend on whether you have air separators. I'm not sure how it would be different between pump or piping, and I've definitely seen scoured elbows.

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

I've seen water "erode" domestic copper water pipe. It appeared that the water velocity was sufficient in areas of high turbulence (bends/restrictions) to strip the protective oxide coating off. The piping corroded away in these areas- but the root cause was the high water velocity.

As a chem eng/metallurgist the first part of any answer I give starts with "It Depends"

RE: Is there a maximum to flow velocity in a pipe due to physical reasons?

itdepends,
          You say "The piping corroded away in these areas- but the root cause was the high water velocity." but I think you meant to say "the piping eroded away..." since water does not corrode copper pipe!!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources