×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

(OP)
Hi gentleman,

I have done it many times but need a bit of scientific explanation to the approach I have taken.

I have a feeder entering  a 2 MVA 13.8 kV transformer stepping it down to 4.16 kV Secondary which is resistance grounded with ground fault limited to 10 A NGR.


I need to have a ground fault protection on primary feeder from utility entering the transformer.I have two methods, either a residual scheme or a core balance CT.

My ground fault current from utility on primary side is 2000 A.  My phase CT are 150: 5.

If I use a core balance approach, based on the fault as soon as it will pick up, relay will use TOC chr. What if it is a solid ground fault, a 2000 A ground fault will saturate a 150:5 zero seq. CT. Do you think it matters or it could be an issue.

I think It is the same issue in residual scheme, Could you guys suggest. Which one is better.

Thanks

RE: Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

Residual scheme is the most common as you already have the 3 phase CTs and the even the relay in most cases.

As for scientific, either scheme will measure the same current, the time delay depends on the relay settings.

As for the saturation, I would think the available 3 phase fault current is also in the range of 2000A. So if the CT are suitable to sense 2000A of phase fault currents, they would have no issue with a ground fault of the same magnitude.
The saturation issue is no different from when there is a phase to phase fault of 2000A.

Rafiq Bulsara
http://www.srengineersct.com

RE: Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

There is no enough to say your CT will saturate or not, it also depends on how much burden the CT has.  Keep in mind to make CT sat is not the current but the secondary voltage.  So if you have less than standard burden you could have more than 20 pu throughout current; however, it also depends on the fault angle at the incident moment and residual flux on the CT.

The other way you can detect the LG fault is to use open corner delta overvoltage detection.  

RE: Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

Pam60,
Earth fault current of 2000A could mean that the utility trafo NER is sized to the full load current of the trafo.
Such large currents will allow use of phase CTs for earth fault protection as well (through residual connection).
CBCT is superior to residual connction only when the earth fault current is limited to a low value (when compared to the phase CT primary rated current) which is not the case here.
With regard to the subject of CT saturation, you can estimate knowing the CT ALF, rated VA burden vis-a-vis the actual connected burden.
Generally speaking, the CT saturation is an issue with phase fault protection and in case of earth fault protection only if the system is solidly grounded.
Trust the above is helpful.

RE: Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

(OP)
Thanks Raghun
I guess you caught a nerve here that when currents are high residual scheme is the way to go and that is why I was seeing more and more residual schemes in the past on the primary side but could never got to see the actual explanation.

Your last comment
" speaking, the CT saturation is an issue with phase fault protection and in case of earth fault protection only if the system is solidly grounded."

How would a residual scheme CT saturation will play out in a solidly grounded system. Could you kindly explain.

Thanks



 

RE: Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

Pam60,
Residual scheme, CT saturation will not be an issue presuming that the phase CTs are already adequately sized for the phase fault current magnitudes.
In other words, in solidly eathed systems with residually connected E/F protection, CT saturation can be an issue for both phase and earth faults if CTs are not adequately sized.
Trust I could make myself clear.

RE: Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

I think you see a lot of residual schemes because it doesn't require additional CT's and is built in to most modern relays.

Alan
"The engineer's first problem in any design situation is to discover what the problem really is." Unk.

RE: Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

(OP)
Thanks All. I also made an interesting observation recently.

I was looking at a relay file of SR750 from GE and I noticed that ground element was disabled. After I did my research I found that SR750 has two CT ground inputs G3 H3 and G10 and H10.

Neutral elements in the relay file calculates the residual current on its own and does not need any physical CT input and used phase CT ratio for calculation.

So Technically and physically there is no residual scheme and nothing is being physically implemented.

Is this the practice as well.

Thanks

RE: Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

Pam:

In SR750, terminals G3-H3 are for sensitive GF and G10-H10 is for regular GF scheme.  This relay also has 51N function or neutral overcurrent and that is a calculated value (for GE SR relays). The separate ground CT input is for 51G function  or a measured value(for GE again).

Just wiring alone is not sufficient, the relay also needs to be programmed correctly to function.  I have also seen the neutral of the phase CTs connected to G10-H10 in a 3-wire system.

You would do well to involve someone familiar with SR750 and ground fault protection schemes. Also refer to the relay manual for more info.

Rafiq Bulsara
http://www.srengineersct.com

RE: Selection of Ground Fault Detection method

Pam - that's pretty much what I was trying to say. What you describe is accurate, but as others have said the relay must be programmed correctly to make it work. The manual is pretty good.
 

Alan
"The engineer's first problem in any design situation is to discover what the problem really is." Unk.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources