×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

About Roark's book: stress and strain

About Roark's book: stress and strain

About Roark's book: stress and strain

(OP)
Being European, I'd like to know whether it would be helpful getting me the "Roark's formulas for stress and strain" book.
Are the formulas in Metric or Imperial units?
No point in getting me a book full of inches, psi and lbs, as I do not come across these units when I work.

Anyone could confirm this?

Many thanks...

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

i believe there is 2 versions of the book. Si and english

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

But surely to an engineer it's principle that matters, you can always sort out the units according to what suits you.

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

I have the 7th ed.  It is advertised as being a mix of SI and "United States Customary Units":
http://www.bookmarki.com/Roark-s-Formulas-for-Stress-and-Strain-7th-Ed-p/007072542x.htm
From looking through it I see there seem many more USCU "examples" than SI examples, however all the formula's are presented in a standard engineering manner that is not unit-specific.

Re: PC's comment.  FWIW I have lived my whole life in the US.  I can/have worked most simple type problems in both systems.  As the complexity of problem increases, I have found it is invariably easier to convert input quantities to SI (even though given in USCU), perform the entire calculation using SI units, and convert the output quantities back to USCU.  By "easier", I mean fewer unit conversions requires, less thought and book-keeping required to tend to unit-related matters.  Things like numerical differentiation and numerical integration flow naturally when SI units are used without extra consideration of factors related to units.   My stuff usually doesn't include things involving empircal correlation relationships.
 

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

I will also say the examples are a very small part of the book.  I agree with PeterCharles from the standpoint that I personally wouldn't judge this book on the basis of the units used.  

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

(OP)
I might be persuaded and order me a copy, still not very convinced as graphs with psi in the y-axis doesn't tell me much... but indeed it's the principle that matters.

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

(OP)
Don't have mathcad, I do about all of my calculations by hand using an old casio calculator...

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

I happen to be working through some of the Pressure Vessel calculations in Roark's in a MathCad e-Book this morning, and I surely would hate to have to go back to solving this stuff with a slide rule (or even a calculator).  Stress on a flat plate (which I recalled as two equations) is two pages.

David

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

For a limited set of calculations, one can easily imagine programming a calculator or entering the problem into Excel.  But, after about 6 months or a year, someone comes in with requirements in a different unit system; then what?  In most other cases, you wind up effectively recoding the equation, just to make sure you got all the conversions correct.  

In Mathcad, that's completely unnecessary:
>  The equations are in natural form, so they're completely readable as recognizable equations like those in the text
>  In most cases, an entry requiring, say, psi, can simply be entered with Pa, and that's ALL you have to do.

Obviously, much of this requires that the equations be properly entered and dimensioned in the first place, but the effort is not that different than validating the equation as used in any other calculation approach.  The difference is that if done correctly, you ought not need to do that ever again.

One option, to get your feet wet, is to buy a copy of Studyworks for about $10: http://cgi.ebay.com/StudyWorks-Mathematics-Deluxe-PC-CD-high-school-math_W0QQitemZ270539348611QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item3efd66da83

While it's quite outdated, ca. 2002, this stripped-down version of Mathcad is still quite useful for numerical calculations, and provides a human-readable input/output for archival and documentation purposes.  Note that Studyworks does not include programming and some higher-order math functionality, and only a limited symbolic capability.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

Get the book, it's useful either way.  Most of the formulas are not unit-specific; right offhand, I can't think of any that are.

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

I have the 6th International Edition.  Most of the formulae are not unit specific.  The examples are a mix of both SI and Imperial units.  

The preface even states "The sixth edition uses the International System of Units (SI) in presenting many of the example problems.  Tabulated coefficients were in dimensionless form before and remain unchanged.  Design formulas drawn from works published in the past remain in the system of units originally published or quoted."

Its a useful reference so you should get a copy.

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

i'll be contray ... if you don't want to convert units, then get a book with only SI units ... just be careful of Newtons and kgf.

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

Quote:

just be careful of Newtons and kgf.


A kgf is not an SI unit!

(Neither for that matter is the cm.)

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/
 

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

Isn't that hilarious?  The first time I saw a gauge marked in "kg/cm^2" I took a picture of it to show people when they start on the "Metric is Perfect" high horse.

I work with metric a lot.  I work with US Traditional Units a lot.  Jumping back and forth is pretty easy (especially since I started imbedding the required units within empirical equations in MathCAD--I love that I can input "mm" and then MathCAD divides it by "inches" to get a unitless number that is consistent with the constants).

I think that the important thing with units is that you have clear communication.  If you do that then microFarads/fortnight is almost reasonable.

David

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

To zdas - I'm not sure the exact definition of "metric", but I can guarantee cm is not part of the SI system.  

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

Not me.  I didn't even mention SI.  That is a race that I don't have a dog in.  I'm just trying to communicate.  If I need to talk in kPa to communicate in most of the world, I can do that.  If I have to talk in kgf I usually take a pass because my giggle quotient gets out of control.  If I'm in Canada I can talk volume units of E3m3 and pretend that everyone knows what the values for STP are.  In Australia I can talk TJ and pretend that everyone knows the energy to volume conversion for the particular gases under discussion.  I try to keep my giggling to myself when people say how easy their system is and how hard mine is.

I just want to communicate, don't care what is in SI and what isn't, don't care who uses what units that are excluded from the SI protocols, mostly just don't care.

David

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

EP,

You should read the BIPM brochure, specifically Chapter 3, "Decimal multiples and submultiples of SI units"  Note also, Table 6 in Chapter 4.1, where non-SI units are defined in SI units, and cm is used as a "SI unit."

The "Bureau" is the final arbiter of all things SI, if they say cm is a part of SI, then it is.   

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

I stand corrected.  My point was m,k,s and the other 4 base units and units derived from the first 7 give a consistent set of units which make life easier.  I don't think anyone reading this needs a tutorial on units.  Ironically the intention of my initial comments was to avoid a big unit discussion by attempting to paint a middle ground between original poster and another comment.  In retrospect, a silly idea.  

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

EP,

No worries...

Like Dave, the tool I use is indifferent to unit systems.  

The only downside, as it were, is that I forget what most of the conversion factors are.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: About Roark's book: stress and strain

Quote:

You are correct about kgs, but incorrect about cm.

It seems I was.  Nonetheless it is normal practice (at least in the English speaking world) to use multiples of 1000 of the base units, which does make life much easier.

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources