×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wind loading debate

Wind loading debate

Wind loading debate

(OP)
The old New York City Building Code(1968) allows for use of 30 psf wind loads for up to around 100ft for buildings.  This is for the MWFRS as well as cladding to my knowledge.  I've seen it used for both.

ASCE 7-02 and other versions of course require much higher wind loads for cladding (depending on panel size) in the range of 100 ft elevation.  Say around 70 psf in some cases for suction on cladding at the corner of a facade.

I would design for the higher ASCE 7 load, even if the old code allows me to use the 30 psf.  ASCE 7 is supported by the latest research for one, and the difference is > 2:1.  Another engineer argues that the old code is still legal for some projects and that as long as we satisfy the code, we've done our job; and nothing is flying off buildings in NYC(so far as we can remember), so it must be reasonable.

Any suggestions on how to get a better understanding of the physics and issues behind this?

RE: Wind loading debate

Just because nothing has happened so far (as far as you know) is not a good reason.  Perhaps a design wind load has not occured at your building.

The current NYC building code should tell you what is adequate, 1968 or current code.  Even if 1968 is allowed, I'd advise client of this and let them make decision.  You client will not be happy if they have to replace torn off cladding next year.

I agree with you.  I'd recommend using the current code due to improvements in wind loading code.

RE: Wind loading debate

There is an expectation in all contracts, whether stated or implied, that the EOR will perform the work with due diligence.

Hanging ones hat one the technicality that allowed one to use an an old loading that has been shown to be inadequate won't do any good in court if there is a failure.

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: Wind loading debate

jsd is right....the buildings have not seen the design loads, but we should design for them anyway.  That engineer is thinking like a contractor.

Michael's comment about diligence is on target.  We are required to exhibit a reasonable standard of care.  To design for a lower load because of old technology or information when we know the research and technology do not support that, in my opinion, violates a reasonable standard of care.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources