×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Sag Rod Support

Sag Rod Support

Sag Rod Support

(OP)
I am designing an industrial building to house a process plant, the frame is clad with C10 wind girts which span 20' at each bay.  I have decided to use sag rods in my design.

Based on my investigations here I have found several excellent discussions regarding the use of Sag Rods for providing bracing to wind girts.  

What seems to be missing from my research is information regarding the end support of the sag rods.  Are they supported at the eve by a dedicated beam for the gravity and bracing loads?  Are they also connected at the foundation? Or do they simply connect to adjacent steel members?

I am assuming it is supported at the eve level and I have some creative ideas for providing this support, but did not want to wander too far from typical practice.

Thank you for your time,
- bd
 

RE: Sag Rod Support

There is a special beam at the eave level that carries the vertical load from the sag rods (usually the DL of the girts and the stability load from the sag rods).  The rods don't need to be attached to the foundation in my view.

RE: Sag Rod Support

Usually, they hang from the eaves beam, the same one that carries the wind load to the braced bays. It is okay if the top rod comes down at a small angle to get to the CL of the girt. I agree with Jed, I never attached to the foundation.

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: Sag Rod Support

With negative pressure on the wall, the inside flange is in compression.  Do you regard the sag rods as providing lateral support to the compression flange?

BA

RE: Sag Rod Support

(OP)
BA,

Based on a report that offered photographs and numerical results of a full-scale test I am convinced of the bracing characteristics of a sag rod design for the wind-girts.

I'm pretty sure I found this information at Eng-Tips on another thread.  

"Behavior and Design of Girts and Purlins for Negative Pressure" by Peter C. Birkemoe.  Found in the Canadian Structural Engineering Conference of 1976.  
 

RE: Sag Rod Support

damronb,
You're probably correct, but I've always been a bit leery about considering the inside flange braced, particularly if the sag rod is fastened to the middle of the girt.  Maybe it would be better to fasten the sag rods nearer the inside flange.  The outside flange is normally braced continuously by the exterior sheeting.

BA

RE: Sag Rod Support

(OP)
BA, I think you are correct about doing my best to optimize the detail by placing the rod toward the inside flange.  I will show this setup in my details.  

Now I just need to decide where to place the eve strut to act both as my collector element for lateral forces and as support for the sag rod.  I was hoping to place it on the center line of the building frame columns at the knee of my bent, but that's pretty "far away" from the edge where the girts are located.  I think it would generate a 10 degree angle from vertical to connect the first rod from eve strut to wind girt at their current locations.

 

RE: Sag Rod Support

Not sure where you are located, but why not use proprietary bridging sections rather than sag rods?  They brace the inside flange and provide sag support.  With bridging sections, you can prop from the floor, while sag rods are normally tension only.

In my experience, the bridging or sag rods are not hung from the eave strut, but rather from the eave purlin or purlin bridging, or in the case of the gable ends, from the barge.

Why would you use C girts rather than Z's?  Maybe it is just local practice, but lapped Z's provide better economy.

http://www.lysaght.com/files/dmfile/LysaghtZedCeesPart1Sep08.pdf

RE: Sag Rod Support

If the girt is considered to support the vertical weight of the siding, an eccentric placement will put a torque on the girt.

We used to make a composite eaves strut by connecting a channel of the same size as the girt to the bottom of the wide flange. This started before we had wide flanges and used I beams that needed the extra lateral capability. They, the I beams, often had a channel on the top flange as well.

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: Sag Rod Support

paddington,

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the girt supports the siding, even a concentric placement of sag rods will put a torque on the girt.  In the case of 10" channels, the eccentricity would be 5" plus half the depth of siding.

I like hokie's idea of proprietary bridging sections supporting the siding from the bottom, but common practice in my area is to use sag rods.  I don't think I have ever seen bridging sections.

BA

RE: Sag Rod Support

Usually the siding is vertically supported by the eave beam or strut on most buildings.  I've never relied on the horizontal girts for vertical load.

On the previous posts - I mentioned our method - installing the girts with a very small downward sag at the midspan.  The sag rods, whether at the centroid or near the inside flange, then act as tension members coupled with the siding to form a rotational couple.  Since the girt is downward sagging, any wind suction that induces compression on the inside flange will develop lateral torsional buckling downward (due to the initial sag).  The sag rods are then in tension resisting the LTB.

 

RE: Sag Rod Support

Another point...if sag rods are expected to provide compressive as well as tensile resistance, double nuts are required at each girt.  I don't think a nut above the girt has been standard practice in my area, but it could be adopted at little extra cost.

BA

RE: Sag Rod Support

On second thought, it would make more sense to tie the bottom girt down to the foundation.  Then the sag rods could work in tension to prevent either upward or downward movement.

BA

RE: Sag Rod Support

That is a good idea.

RE: Sag Rod Support

I have detailed sag rods such that they were "X" shaped between girt for this very reason. Basically amounting to tension only "X" bracing between girts parallel to the wind loading.  

RE: Sag Rod Support

With regard to industrial buildings, it is poor practice in my opinion to count on wall sheathing for strength. Plants cut holes int he sides of their building all the time.  

RE: Sag Rod Support

(OP)
The input has been great for this question, thank you everyone.  

Hokie66 asked where I was located.  Our design firm is in the States, but the project is in mid-Oaxaca Mexico, not the middle of nowhere, but a lot of options either.  We've been given a limited list of what they have available as far as structural shapes are concerned.  They may have access to proprietary shapes or wind girt bridging, but I am unaware of it if they do.

ToadJones - I too had the design intent to rely little on the building skin for strength due to unknown holes in the future, but I had applied this philosophy mainly to the design of the frame bents, not to the wind girts, this is an insight that I will need to investigate further.  Thank you.

JAE - It sounds like you've not relied on the wind girts for supporting the dead load of the wall skin, this is an interesting idea.  How do you typically support the eve beam over the wind girts?

RE: Sag Rod Support

There are many different arrangements for different building types that can lead to many ways to support the sag rods.

In some of the industrial structures I have worked on there are struts along the column line at or near the eave height. The girt line is typically 2'-0" or so. So what I would wind up with is an eave beam and a column line strut running parallel between which small sag-rod-support-beams would be run (2' long or so). Looking up at it, it looks like a ladder. This ladder also supports the gutter trough one way or the other. The eave beam would have to be supported by an outrigger in this case.

Keep in mind this situation is on heavy industrial buildings, not PEMB or the like.  

RE: Sag Rod Support

in lighter applications the last roof purlin can double as the eave beam resting on outriggers (out to the girt line). The sag rods can be hung from the purlin so long as it is sized to carry the wall girt load.  

RE: Sag Rod Support

And if you have open web steel roof joists that are perpendicular to the wall, the joist seats can cantilever over the edge beam to provide support for sag rods.

DaveAtkins

RE: Sag Rod Support

What about carrying the sheeting on the foundation?

BA

RE: Sag Rod Support

Many of our buildings are using thicker insulated metal panels, like these:  (Panel webpage)

They typically rest on concrete grade beams and support their own weight.

For lighter panels, they still have vertical flutes, typically, so they have some ability to support their own weight provided the girt spacing isn't too far.  Otherwise providing a rigid continuous edge angle that can support the vertical load - usually cantilevered off the edge beam - is used.

I'm sure there are many other approaches.

RE: Sag Rod Support

I usually, conservatively, assume the wall load is carried at the eave beam/strut. Siding loads girts, girts load sag rods, sag rods load eave strut or other supporting member.
  

RE: Sag Rod Support

Some of the PEMB I have erected in the past had no sag rods at all. I had to cut wood blocking with keep the Z girts level and straight until we fastened the siding.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources