×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

UBC or ASCE Earthquake load

UBC or ASCE Earthquake load

UBC or ASCE Earthquake load

(OP)
Hi

When it comes to Earthquake load calculations, which is more appropriate to use? UBC or ASCE?
For some reason I hear UBC. Could anyone elaborate on why?

Thanks

V

RE: UBC or ASCE Earthquake load

I say ASCE is the code you want, sort of.  

Historically, UBC has been the leader in earthquake design loading.  Since the merger of codes and the introduction of IBC, IBC has been the appropriate code.  IBC now references ASCE7-05.  By reference, ASCE is part of IBC.

UBC97 (the last edition) is generally outdated unless you do work outside of the US.

Use IBC.

RE: UBC or ASCE Earthquake load

(OP)
Well, the project we work on are mostly in the middle east. So the UBC would be a better choice then>

RE: UBC or ASCE Earthquake load

yeah, UBC is obsolete. Even California already switched to IBC about 2 to 3 years ago.

Dont know if there are still any US state using UBC.
 

RE: UBC or ASCE Earthquake load

For projects in the Middle East, I don't think the IBC has much relevance.  "International" doesn't reflect the standing of the code, as it is really only used in the US.

RE: UBC or ASCE Earthquake load

The last project I had in the mid-east, used UBC, I would go with IBC.  It's used as a model code in more places than people give it credit for.

RE: UBC or ASCE Earthquake load

ASCE is better since the IBC and the "then" UBC make references on this code

UBC stops producing on 1997 if i remember it correctly

But they said you must look at the UFC to know which code to look according to what kind of structures you are designing

Poems are made by fools like me, but only God can make a tree. engineers creates wonderful buildings, but only God can creates wonderful minds

RE: UBC or ASCE Earthquake load

(OP)
Thanks for your answers. It was really educational.

However, it still leaves me quite confused.

For example. We have had projects with the same contractor (In the middle east) where we used both UBC (Earthquake load) and ASCE (Other loads) in one location and only ASCE in a different location, but the same country.

I wonder now, on what grounds are these chosen? Anything to do with the scale of the structure? or perhaps is it just somebody's personal preference?

RE: UBC or ASCE Earthquake load

It depends on the country.  Some countries don't have their own or preferred codes, so the consultants choose the ones with which they are familiar or the ones most likely to suit suppliers of steel sections, etc.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources