×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

connector spacing for built up members

connector spacing for built up members

connector spacing for built up members

(OP)
I am trying to reinforce a 140' 12-sided pole.  It is galvanized steel 5/16" thick at the base.  I'd like to bolt on some plates in order to reinforce the pole.  

The AISC LRFD spec J3.5 states that the longitudinal spacing for connectors shall not exceed 24*t or 12" for members not subject to corrosion.  

I'm wondering if this applies here (although the pole is subject to corrosion it is galvanized).  And if so, why is the fastener spacing so close.  This pole is overstressed up to 100'.  At a 7" bolt spacing thats a lot of bolts.  I've checked the horizontal shear and checked the plates as a column and have come up with a bolt spacing of about 18".  Can anybody comment about the reason for the 24*t requirement?


 

RE: connector spacing for built up members

The commentary elaborates on the reasoning for the requirement.  It's to hold the plates tight against each other to prevent water from getting trapped in between them, which would lead to corrosion.  It mentions specifically in the case of paint failure, though.  It doesn't address this issue for galvanized material.

RE: connector spacing for built up members

Isn't part of the reason also to prevent local buckling of the individual element before global buckling of the built up member?

RE: connector spacing for built up members

You check that separately.  This requirement is independent of local buckling.

RE: connector spacing for built up members

I assume this pole is in place already.

Probably a stupid question, but have you checked the cost of this swiss cheese repair against replacing the pole?

And how are you going to install the bolts with no access to the back side of the connection?

Hg

Eng-Tips policies:  FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: connector spacing for built up members

(OP)
Yes, the cost of the reinforcements will be expensive.  Its a pole for a wireless carrier with some existing antennas on it.  Generally they opt for expensive reinforcement instead of bringing down the site temporarily.  

I was planning to use Lindapter hollo bolts to secure the plate.

-JT

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources