×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

API 650 Design Wind Pressure
2

API 650 Design Wind Pressure

API 650 Design Wind Pressure

(OP)
There appears to be a discrepancy in the design wind pressure for API 650 tanks.  

-Section 5.2.1 defines the wind pressure on vertical surfaces to be 0.86(V/190)^2 or 18(V/120)^2 which is used in the wind overturning (Section 5.11) and Appendix F calculations.

-When calculating the stiffener requirements for wind (Section 5.9.7) and for external pressure in App V, it indicates that the wind design pressure is 1.48(V/190)^2 or 31(V/120)^2

Can anyone explain why two different wind pressures are used?  Thanks.

RE: API 650 Design Wind Pressure

It looks to me like one factor is the average pressure over the projected shell area and includes a drag coefficient; the other is the peak pressure.

RE: API 650 Design Wind Pressure

The 31 psf is the classical stagnation pressure of air hitting a flat plate using the modification factors shown.  I believe that the 18 psf used for wind stability includes an additional shape factor for cylindrical shells.  Using the full stagnation pressure for shell buckling is reasonable because buckling is a local phenomenon, over a small distance the shell would feel the full stagnation pressure and the buckling pressure is perpendicular to the shell.  For wind stability, using a shape factor is reasonable because the total overturning moment from wind is a global net pressure and round surfaces shed some of the wind.  Note also that API uses a different net pressure for the cone roof which is a different shape.

RE: API 650 Design Wind Pressure

For what it's worth, AWWA uses similar factors, more explicitly though - 0.60 for cylinders, 1.0 for flat plates and 0.50 for conical.  The form of the equation is the same, using 0.00256 (density of air) times wind velocity squared times modification factors.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources