×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Applicability of Simplified Wind Method.

Applicability of Simplified Wind Method.

Applicability of Simplified Wind Method.

(OP)
Hi all,

IBC (03) 1609.1.1 says that wind loads shall be determined per ASCE 7 (02) with one of the exceptions being "Wind loads determined by the provisions of Section 1609.6," which is the simplified method. Section 1609.6.1.2 gives conditions under which the simplified method can be used for components and cladding. Well, ASCE 7 (02) Section 6.4.1.2 gives 5 conditions, all of which must be met in order to use the simplified method for components and cladding. All of these conditions can be found somewhere in the IBC except the last one which states, "the building is not subject to the topographic effects of Section 6.5.7 (i.e., Kzt = 1.0)."

It seems that the ASCE 7 is adding an additional requirement on top of the IBC. Is this correct? In my region, a location where Kzt = 1.0 is non-existent. Does that mean I can never use the simplified method? No one in my office ever noticed this before because if you can use the simplified method per the IBC, one would never bother to pick up the ASCE 7 in the first place!

Thanks in advance for your comments.

RE: Applicability of Simplified Wind Method.

You will find that the simplified method is very conservative, and I have personally found that it applies in the order of 25% more load to the structure in specific circumstances than the Equivalent Force Method. You may save on analysis time, but the owner will pay with the extra materials.  

It is OK for simple projects, but for the more complicated and larger projects, use EFM.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Applicability of Simplified Wind Method.

Sorry, I don't know what I was thinking - seismic is not wind.  But the same thoughts of mine still apply.  Senior moment.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Applicability of Simplified Wind Method.

I wouldn't use the simplified method.  You can buy a piece software for probably $500 bucks that will run through Method 2 for you.   

RE: Applicability of Simplified Wind Method.

You need to check the building code requirements and amendments to the code for the local jurisdiction. If it states the IBC and has no amendment sending you to a section of another standard then you use just the IBC section.
I have mostly used the simplified method for wind and the equivalent force method for siesmic.

Garth Dreger PE
AZ Phoenix area

RE: Applicability of Simplified Wind Method.

BlastResistant

The IBC 06 refers to the ASCE 7-05 only for determining wind loads. For the simplified method, the ASCE 7-05 does not have the condition that Kzt=1.0.

So in my opinion you are OK with using the simplified method.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources