×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

What went wrong?

What went wrong?

What went wrong?

(OP)
I work for an electric utility company and am trying to figure out what went wrong in the scenario below:

A new commercial building was in the middle of construction and we were called out to energize the brand new transformer we had installed to serve only this building.  Upon energizing the transformer, a resident drove up and reported smoke in their hourse.  A few minutes later, the fire department showed up and stated they were getting reports of smoke in several homes on the street and told us to shut off power to the transformer.  Further investigation showed some burn damage on a water pipe about five feet from the transformer.  The theory is an electrical ground fault travelled on the water pip and entered several homes nearby and damaged some of their appliances and electronic equipment.  We checked the transformer and the primary connections and nothing was wrong.  My question is, what could the electrician have done wrong on the secondary of the transformer that could have caused this event?  The electrician ran the secondary cable from the transformer, to the new commercial building, and terminated the wires at the meter at the building and the secondary of the transformer (we witnessed the secondary terminations).  

The electrician had not bonded to the water pipe in the building yet, so if the phase and neutral cable were switched, the main water pipe which it is believed carried the fault, could not have been energized.  

RE: What went wrong?

What kind of connection at the transformer in question?  What kind of connection at the service transformers of the affected customers.

RE: What went wrong?

Quote:

The electrician had not bonded to the water pipe in the building yet, so if the phase and neutral cable were switched, the main water pipe which it is believed carried the fault, could not have been energized.

This seems odd. Most inspectors won't approve an installation for service until the grounding system (electrodes, conductors, bonding, etc.) is in place. What is your utilities and the inspection authorities process for verifying completed inspections and approvals and energizing new services?

RE: What went wrong?

Check the ground-neutral connection at the new transformer.  If there were a fault on the new transformer and the transformer neutral was tied to a ground rod 5' from the water pipe, but not metallically connected to the primary neutral, you could get return current flowing through the earth from the ground rod to the water pipe, then to the primary neutral through the neighboring service grounds.  This may put a high voltage on the neighboring service grounds.

Is it a pole-mount or padmount transformer?  Did any overcurrent device trip?

RE: What went wrong?

The building frame is probably electrically connected to the water pipe, even if not yet bonded at the service. If the same water pipe serves the houses and there is a ground fault in the building, with no water pipe connection at the service it could energize the pipe (and the frame of the building).

Alan
"The engineer's first problem in any design situation is to discover what the problem really is." Unk.

RE: What went wrong?

I spoke with the engineer who investigated an incident in Central America. Some of this is speculation because attempts were made to "cover up" before the engineer arrived. The system grounding was almost nonexistent. A primary conductor came off the pin and rested on the cross arm near the secondary neutral. Arcing and tracking and poor grounding of the secondary all combined to place several thousand volts common mode voltage on the 120:240 Volt secondary system. Fires were started in several buildings that were fed from the circuit by current passing through the insulation of the circuit conductors to the building structure. You may have had a similar situation. Examination of the ares where the smoke was generated would be enlightening.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources