×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

(OP)
What is the top layer of steel for in a reinforced concrete spread footing?

I have seen multiple structural designs where some engineers specify a layer of steel at top and bottom of footings and others where engineers only specify the bottom of the footing.

The only two reasons I see it being necessary is either for uplift changing the direction of bending in a footing or temperature and shrinkage min. steel requirements. Just looking for some guidance. Thanks.

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

Could be for uplift, or for ftgs with moment.  I've never been given good guidance on this, and opinions seem to vary, but I would probably provide nominal top steel in ftgs over 2'-0" thick.

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

I use a top layer of reinforcing for single footings with uplift.  

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

(OP)
What ratio of steel do you place at the top? same as bottom? 0.0018bh?...

After posting I read in the RISAfoundation manual that their program will use a top layer when the footing goes into "partial uplift" designed for the negative moment induced by the uplift action.

It seems to me that for simplicity, a lot of engineers just place whatever amount of steel used in the bottom (based on design) in the top of the footing also. Just wanted to make sure I wasnt missing something. Thanks for the responses.

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

Yes, I would use a min of 0.0018bh in the top.

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

If it is major steel, it is definitely for uplift.

If is is smaller bars, then it could be minimum reinforcing or for uplift.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

I generally use the same in the top and bottom so that it doesn't get mixed up in the field. Sometimes the footing can work as unreinforced for uplift but I just add the top layer of steel.

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

If a footing is subject to uplift or overturning, it probably needs top flexural reinforcement.  If only gravity loading, top reinforcement is detrimental, as plastic settlement cracking often occurs due to inadequate consolidation.

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

If no uplift I usually use smaller bars and space them twice as long as the bottom rebars (easier installation because they are at the same locations every other bot. rebar)

Never, but never question engineer's judgment

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

I agree with Hokie

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while you realize that they like it

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

Use top bars when uplift occurs. I also think it is beneficial to place two smaller diameter bars in the corners of the hold-down bolt to help engage the entire footing for uplift conditions.
_|___|_____
 |     |
 |     |
 |     |
 |     |
 |     |
 \o_o/

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

nah some engineers are just too conservative.. in my field whatever rebar we use for bottom we use the same for the top especially for small footings..

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

I specify top reinf to match bottom reinf for all footing subject to uplift/lateral forces.

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

Hokie-
Can you explain your above comment with regard to consolidation?  

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

Thanks, rower.  That's what I meant.  The first time I saw a footing with orthogonal cracking on the top, I scratched my head a bit before understanding what had happened.  Now I have scratched it too much, and there is no hair left.

With top bars in deep sections, it is usually necessary to revibrate to prevent plastic settlement cracks.

Those settlement cracks illustrated in the link due to different thickness are a worse situation than the ones over the bars.

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

Hmmm-
I have never seen it. Makes good sense and it is good to know.
Our guys do run vibrators in the footing during the whole placement. Maybe we're getting lucky?  

RE: Top layer or reinforcement in column footings

Yes, it can certainly vary with the concrete mix, weather conditions, etc., but in deep elements it can occur even with reasonably thorough initial vibration.  This type plastic settlement is the same reason you don't pour the floor until the column below hardens.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources