×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends
2

Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

(OP)
All

We are often asked to design industrial portal frame  buildings for use as loading facilities for trucks etc. Typically these are long rectangular single story buildings with gable roofs or similar. They are fully clad along the side walls and roof but fully open at both ends to allow the trucks to drive in and out.

Due to the large openings we have typically treated both side walls as "windward" as a conservative approach to allow for wind that may hit the building slightly off perpendicular to the side walls (ie cross wind). Although there would certainly be some shielding from the first wall we often dont account for this.

I would like to improve on this design method and would be interested in hearing how others treat these type of structures for cross wind loading.

Appreciate any feedback/ advise

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

Open Structure, definitely.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

Surely you would allow for shielding and not apply double the windward wall pressure.  Think of it this way...if the wind is at 45 degrees, the sum of windward pressures on the two surfaces would be 1.4 x the single wall pressure.  For smaller angles, affecting the ends of the building, you could have larger pressures.

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

Well....actually it is a partially enclosed structure.  In order to be an open structure, at least 80 percent of each wall must be open.

Fairly often such buildings are in relatively open areas and should be designed under Exposure Condition "C", not "B" as is often used, keeping in mind that if any upwind direction has 600 feet or more of unobstructed space, then "C" must be used.  Obviously, design for the condition now, not what might be in the future.

Your approach is probably overly conservative.  Do your analysis with the wind "face on" and oblique and you'll see the actual difference.  You might be overdesigning by 30 or 40 percent.

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

Some of the terminology is a problem here.  Might help if the OP identified which country and code he is working to.

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

Hokie66...good point.  We jumped the gun here again and assumed ASCE 7.  The OP shows NZ, so closer to Oz than here.

Apologies to the OP for assuming!

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

(OP)
Thanks guys, some good points here. Ron is correct, we normally design structures in NZ and Aus. In parts of Aus winds are often cyclonic and hence we chose the conservitive approach. AS1170.2 has a couple of ways to deal with shielding. 1 is a multiplier to deal with near by buildings, the other is used for multiple  open frames.In this case I could use the former and treat the windward wall as a neighbouring building. I will investigate more.

Thanks

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

I like Hokie's way of thinking. I think applying the loading twice is very heavy handed. The way I see it, is at 0-22.5 deg you would develop a air bubble in the middle of the building thus you will get some varying internal pressures but no ability to generate internal pressures. at 77.5-90, the walls should be treated as free standing as per D2.1.

so this leaves the 22.5-77.5 which is up for grabs, I I would suggest you read- Holmes, J. D. (2000) 'Wind loading of parallel free-standing walls on bridges, cliffs and embankments', he also talks about it in his book, "wind loading of structures".

He shows that with closely space free standing walls you have a reduction in the Cpe. he also show that a elevated compared to a non-elevated wall there is an 80-90% difference in the loading, thus I think the roof would also reduce the Cpe from a free standing wall n ground. thus I normally use engineering Judgment based on the length of the building and spacing of the walls and a roof reduction, however normally give the walls are very closely spaced compared to height for the truck stop, I find the worst case is as defined by the code for cross wind however the main conservative step I take is I adopt a higher Kl than required by the code.  

However to get some real advice as to the interpretation of the code send John H (or Cam Leitch/John Ginger from JCU) an email, they all are normally very helpful. Well I wouldn't mind knowing the answer as well so I might send him an email for kicks.  

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while you realize that they like it

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

sorry when I wrote wall on ground compared to bridge I meant to write hoarding compared to bridge.

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while you realize that they like it

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

Ron:

Initially, I read too much into the OP's post here.

Nevertheless, check ASCE 7-05, 6.2 under "Building, Partially Enclosed", specifically the latter portion of note 2.  

I do not know the dimensional particulars of the OP's building here, but the way I read the note is that if the sum of the two endwall areas is 20% or greater of the total wall area of the structure, then it defaults to an open structure.  If not, then it is partially enclosed.

Please correct me if my interpretation is incorrect. neutral

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

Mike,
The default, if it doesn't meet the criteria for a partially enclosed building, is an enclosed building, not an open building (see commentary on 6.2).  Further, the intent of defining an "opening" is one that only receives positive pressure.

Ron

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

Thanks Ron for making that clear.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Wind loading on low rise buildings with large openings at gable ends

The NBC has external and internal wind coefficients for low rise buildings with various roof slopes.  The windward wall has a positive coefficient.  The leeward wall has a negative coefficient indicating suction.  The magnitude of these coefficients varies substantially with the slope of the roof.

Large openings on the end walls could contribute to internal pressure which might affect the design of cladding and roof structure but would not affect the lateral force on the portal frames.

BA

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources